2019
DOI: 10.1017/wpt.2019.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of wireless power transfer technologies for mobile robots

Abstract: Advances in technology have seen mobile robots becoming a viable solution to many global challenges. A key limitation for tetherless operation, however, is the energy density of batteries. Whilst significant research is being undertaken into new battery technologies, wireless power transfer may be an alternative solution. The majority of the available technologies are not targeted toward the medium power requirements of mobile robots; they are either for low powers (a few Watts) or very large powers (kW). This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since, medical facilities vary from large scale centrally located city hospitals to purpose-built field hospitals, various renewable energy sources are also utilized for reliable power solutions [25]. Wireless power transfer is also under development for mobile robots in hospitals to minimize the need for frequent charging [26].…”
Section: Power Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, medical facilities vary from large scale centrally located city hospitals to purpose-built field hospitals, various renewable energy sources are also utilized for reliable power solutions [25]. Wireless power transfer is also under development for mobile robots in hospitals to minimize the need for frequent charging [26].…”
Section: Power Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the figure summarizes 6G performance requirements [1]- [3], technological enablers of energy efficiency in 6G [3]- [5], EH techniques [11]- [13], characteristics and advantages of RF-WET [6], [14]. Regarding the latter, comparison (in terms of coverage, form factor, harvestable energy, and multiuser and mobility native support) between RF-WET and main competitors (electrostatic or capacitive coupling, inductive coupling, and magnetic coupling) is depicted [6], [14]. All in all, RF-WET constitutes the most prominent technology for massively and wirelessly powering low-energy IoT deployments.…”
Section: A Eh Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these operations are time-consuming. As a sustainable solution, wireless power transfer has emerged to address the energy limitations of robots and provide a backup of on-board battery [160]. In literature, there exist several techniques for wireless power transmission including radiative power transfer (microwave, laser) and non-radiative power transfer technologies are (inductive, magnetic resonance, capacitive and acoustic) [161], [162].…”
Section: A Resource Typementioning
confidence: 99%