2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3278901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations to Text and Data Mining and Consumer Empowerment: Making the Case for a Right to Machine Legibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the exemption appears to target the TPM instead of the purpose of the circumvention. There is a legitimate need for a broad access to data including copyright works for the purpose of training artificial intelligence systems so as to produce more precise and insightful results (Ducato & Stowel, 2019), regardless of the type of TPM involved. Hence, there should be parallel exceptions under the TPM and ERMI provisions to accommodate artificial intelligence research and development.…”
Section: The Possible Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the exemption appears to target the TPM instead of the purpose of the circumvention. There is a legitimate need for a broad access to data including copyright works for the purpose of training artificial intelligence systems so as to produce more precise and insightful results (Ducato & Stowel, 2019), regardless of the type of TPM involved. Hence, there should be parallel exceptions under the TPM and ERMI provisions to accommodate artificial intelligence research and development.…”
Section: The Possible Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to article 12(7) GDPR, the information related to the personal data collection and processing can be provided to data subjects "in combination with standardized icons in order to give in an easily visible, intelligible and clearly legible manner a meaningful overview of the intended processing. Where the icons are presented electronically, they shall be machine-readable".22 Considered as a "highly behaviorally-informed legal innovation" (Ducato & Strowel, 2018), this formulation provides guidance on creating informed and express digital consent mechanisms. Article 7(2) GDPR clarifies that when consent is required, it should be presented in "a manner, which is clearly distinguishable from the other matters, in an intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language".…”
Section: Technical Improvement Of Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Há uma segunda camada, composta por restrições tecnológicas ao acesso ou uso de bases de dados 12 , e, ao menos, ainda, uma terceira, sob a forma de proibições legais de burla desses mecanismos, mesmo quando não há violação direta de qualquer direito incidente sobre o material 13 . Isto impacta diretamente atividades essenciais à pesquisa, como verificação, reprodutibilidade e comunicação dos resultados, ao permitir ou limitar quem pode fazer que tipo de pesquisa, utilizando que tipo de material e em que condições 14 , 15 , 16 . Isto se sobressai na TDM, que necessita da maior disponibilidade de fontes possível - as quais nem sempre existem em acesso aberto.…”
unclassified