2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations to the cultural ratchet effect in young children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is noteworthy in light of research suggesting that children are in fact very capable of transmitting conventional knowledge and work to reinforce norms in contexts where they deem high fidelity imitation as the appropriate means of engaging in a novel behavior [46], and will do so along peer-peer chains [64]. Indeed, there is some evidence that when children interpret the purpose of a task as conventional, they persist in transmitting both causally irrelevant actions [52,65] and inefficient methods for achieving instrumental outcomes [66].…”
Section: The Functions Of Ritual In Social Group Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is noteworthy in light of research suggesting that children are in fact very capable of transmitting conventional knowledge and work to reinforce norms in contexts where they deem high fidelity imitation as the appropriate means of engaging in a novel behavior [46], and will do so along peer-peer chains [64]. Indeed, there is some evidence that when children interpret the purpose of a task as conventional, they persist in transmitting both causally irrelevant actions [52,65] and inefficient methods for achieving instrumental outcomes [66].…”
Section: The Functions Of Ritual In Social Group Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some evidence for this is apparent in the studies of so-called 'transmission chains', in which young children learn something and then teach another (and then another down the chain; e.g., [26,27]). In addition, in the studies of norm enforcement cited above (e.g., [14]), in many cases when 3-year-old children corrected norm violators (e.g., 'No, it doesn't work like that'), they continued by instructing the violator about how to do it properly.…”
Section: Instructed Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we noted in our introductory review, the literature addressing this topic through experiments remains limited, especially with children. The latter have focused on cumulative social learning, but either omitted the wider cultural diffusion necessary to identify 'innovation' as here defined [26,46,50], or employed a task that necessarily required cumulative steps for success, constraining inferences about the importance of cumulation in progressive achievements [47], or offered a task in which children could obtain no rewards other than transferring maximal quantities of rice between two containers, as an experimenter encouraged them to attempt [48]. Children showed little or no evidence of cumulative culture in the latter experiment; however, most could already spontaneously recognise adequate ways of transferring rice from the start.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third study [48] used a diffusion chain design with five 'generations' in which young children were set a task of shifting as much rice from one container to another, with tool options ranging from a strip of card (least efficient) to a scoop and a bowl (most efficient). Some chains were seeded by an adult using the inefficient card, and others were unseeded.…”
Section: A Note On Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%