2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4907888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations to the room temperature mobility of two- and three-dimensional electron liquids in SrTiO3

Abstract: We analyze and compare the temperature dependence of the electron mobility of two- and three-dimensional electron liquids in SrTiO3. The contributions of electron-electron scattering must be taken into account to accurately describe the mobility in both cases. For uniformly doped, three-dimensional electron liquids, the room temperature mobility crosses over from longitudinal optical (LO) phonon-scattering-limited to electron-electron-scattering-limited as a function of carrier density. In high-density, two-di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
77
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of the carrier mobility change is typically < 10% of the total conductivity change, as the mobility at these temperatures is limited by optical phonon scattering with only a moderate dependence on the electron density. [23] For a-LAO/STO the maximum carrier density is typically around 10 14 cm -2 at room temperature [19] , whereas for GAO/STO carrier densities up to 10 15 cm -2 have been reported. [17] In both cases, the carrier density can easily be controlled without sample-to-sample variations in a large range from the maximum value to a level where the free carriers cannot be measured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of the carrier mobility change is typically < 10% of the total conductivity change, as the mobility at these temperatures is limited by optical phonon scattering with only a moderate dependence on the electron density. [23] For a-LAO/STO the maximum carrier density is typically around 10 14 cm -2 at room temperature [19] , whereas for GAO/STO carrier densities up to 10 15 cm -2 have been reported. [17] In both cases, the carrier density can easily be controlled without sample-to-sample variations in a large range from the maximum value to a level where the free carriers cannot be measured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the resistivities of typical heavily-doped semiconductors and metals are proportional to temperature, [22,23] the resistivities of many perovskite oxides (SrTiO 3 , [24][25][26] SrMoO 3 , [27] KTaO 3 , [28] SrNbO 3 , [29] and SrCoO 3 ) [30] are proportional to temperature-squared (T 2 ). While the resistivities of typical heavily-doped semiconductors and metals are proportional to temperature, [22,23] the resistivities of many perovskite oxides (SrTiO 3 , [24][25][26] SrMoO 3 , [27] KTaO 3 , [28] SrNbO 3 , [29] and SrCoO 3 ) [30] are proportional to temperature-squared (T 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the low electron mobility of STO at room temperature (and higher temperatures) is largely due to strong electron-phonon coupling, which is the primary limitation for further increasing power factor at room temperatures or higher. [51][52][53][54][55] Besides high effective mass, enhanced scattering rates of electrons (e.g., with phonons) is another reason for low mobility in such large density of states materials.…”
Section: àmentioning
confidence: 99%