2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited angle STIM and PIXE tomography of single cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. As discussed above, this method could facilitate the reconstruction of limited angle tomography data and could constitute an alternative to the option proposed by Andrea et al [17].…”
Section: Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. As discussed above, this method could facilitate the reconstruction of limited angle tomography data and could constitute an alternative to the option proposed by Andrea et al [17].…”
Section: Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An innovative approach was proposed by Andrea et al [17] for limited angle tomography of single cells, over an angular range of 120°. In this study, the missing STIMT projections, over the 60° angle range not covered by the beam, were interpolated using a back and forth numerical guess of the complete sinogram, based on a FBP method.…”
Section: Current Limitations and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that in principle IBA-T (that is, using the BS signals as well as the PIXE signals) is already achievable in principle, and should be significantly more efficient (and therefore much faster) than pure PIXE-T since a single slice already has (nearly) complete 3-D information. This is important since tomography is rather slow, and its importance is increased since it seems that beam damage limits the use of a pure PIXE-T for important classes of samples [85]. In principle, using the depth information available explicitly in IBA-T (from the particle signals) must be quicker than unfolding the depth information available only implicitly (and at much lower resolution) in the PIXE signals.…”
Section: Iba For Blind Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples must be prepared free-standing as far as possible in order to avoid further source of inaccuracy due to the mounting media. On the other hand, a free-standing sample would deteriorate readily as a result of high fluences employed in PIXE-T. Andrea et al 7 performed limited angle tomography of single cells grown on a substrate to overcome the sample preparation limitations. They used an average fluence of 500 pC/µm² per map to avoid the sample deterioration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%