1999
DOI: 10.1007/s003000050337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited effects of egg size on chick growth in the chinstrap Penguin Pygoscelis antarctica

Abstract: We studied the e ect of egg size on chick growth in the chinstrap penguin under natural nonmanipulative, conditions. The in¯uence of egg size on chick mass at hatching, 15 and 45 days of age was analysed controlling for the e ect of hatching date, as hatching date has been repeatedly associated with chick growth in this species. Egg volume explained 20% of the variation in the body mass of chicks at hatching. Its e ect disappeared as chicks grew, being statistically not signi®cant at the age of 15 and 45 days.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, offspring coming from larger eggs most likely experienced an advantage during the critical first days after hatch compared to offspring coming from smaller eggs. This is because in many species egg size may affect hatchling mass and nestling growth (Williams 1994, Belliure et al 1999, Royle et al 1999, Lipar and Ketterson 2000), and sometimes has persistent effects on nestling fitness traits (Smith and Bruun 1998, Styrsky et al 1999, Hipfner 2000, Styrsky et al 2000). Moreover, the amount and quality of nutrients (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, offspring coming from larger eggs most likely experienced an advantage during the critical first days after hatch compared to offspring coming from smaller eggs. This is because in many species egg size may affect hatchling mass and nestling growth (Williams 1994, Belliure et al 1999, Royle et al 1999, Lipar and Ketterson 2000), and sometimes has persistent effects on nestling fitness traits (Smith and Bruun 1998, Styrsky et al 1999, Hipfner 2000, Styrsky et al 2000). Moreover, the amount and quality of nutrients (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual inspection revealed a pair of points, A-and B-eggs of Pygoscelis antarctica, that deviated strongly from an otherwise exceptionally tight linear relationship (data not shown); both eggs were ∼10 g larger than expected from their linear dimensions (A-egg residual p 4.1, Bonferroni ; B-egg P p .0140 residual p 6.4, Bonferroni ). After first confirm-P p .0001 ing that the dimensions reported by Lishman (1985) were likely correct (Belliure et al 1999), we excluded P. antarctica from the regression analysis and estimated A-and B-egg mass for this species also.…”
Section: Appendix a Estimation Of Fresh Egg Mass From Linear Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting our conclusion, 3 and 4 d asynchronies were rare in control nests. In the genus Pygoscelis , the quality advantage of asynchronous broods over synchronous broods disappears during the later crèche phase (Moreno et al ) and hatching asynchrony was only related to the within‐brood asymmetry at 15 d but not at 45 d of age (Belliure et al ). But, in the Jackass penguin, a congener of our study species, brood asymmetry remains until fledging (Seddon and Van Heezik ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Level of support 1) In control nests, asynchrony would be larger in 'bad' years None 2) N2 died more than N1 in HA  4, but not in HA  0 Partial 3) N2 of HA  4 died more than N2 of HA  0 None 4) Average nestling mortality is higher in HA  4 than in HA  0 None 5) N2 of HA  4 died before than N2 of HA  0 Partial 6) Nestlings of HA  4 fledge heavier than nestlings of HA  0 Partial crèche phase (Moreno et al 1994) and hatching asynchrony was only related to the within-brood asymmetry at 15 d but not at 45 d of age (Belliure et al 1999). But, in the Jackass penguin, a congener of our study species, brood asymmetry remains until fledging (Seddon and Van Heezik 1991).…”
Section: Predictionmentioning
confidence: 96%