2005
DOI: 10.1177/003335490512000409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited English Proficiency, Primary Language at Home, and Disparities in Children's Health Care: How Language Barriers are Measured Matters

Abstract: Background. Approximately 3.5 million U.S. schoolchildren are limited in English proficiency (LEP). Disparities in children's health and health care are associated with both LEP and speaking a language other than English at home, but prior research has not examined which of these two measures of language barriers is most useful in examining health care disparities. Objectives. Our objectives were to compare primary language spoken at home vs. parental LEP and their associations with health status, access to ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
124
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
124
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas children in LEP families are most often covered by Medicaid or CHIP, state policies do not apply to privately insured children. 27,31 Reimbursement for language services by private insurance companies is not currently mandated, except in California, and few private insurance companies provide reimbursement. 27,32 Whether additional states would enact similar mandates, or if there are mechanisms other than mandates, to encourage insurance companies to provide language services reimbursement is not known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas children in LEP families are most often covered by Medicaid or CHIP, state policies do not apply to privately insured children. 27,31 Reimbursement for language services by private insurance companies is not currently mandated, except in California, and few private insurance companies provide reimbursement. 27,32 Whether additional states would enact similar mandates, or if there are mechanisms other than mandates, to encourage insurance companies to provide language services reimbursement is not known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average Downs and Black score for quantitative articles was 17 (range 11-25, fair to very good), which has been categorized in previous literature as Bgood.^2 5,26 The range in scores was due to studies not controlling for confounders, study populations not being generalizable, not reporting adverse events, or small sample sizes. The spoken non-English language skills of the patient navigators were minimally reported in seven, as navigators were described as Bbilingual,^either noted to be originally from a country where the target language was spoken, or the navigator's ethnicity was used as an additional descriptor (i.e., Bbilingual Hispanic woman^).…”
Section: Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 LEP persons have difficulty reading, writing and understanding English, 3 which creates obstacles to participation in the English-language dominant healthcare system. Language barriers play a significant role in poor health processes and outcomes, [4][5][6][7] including reduced accessing of preventive services 8,9 and cancer screening rates among LEP patients. [10][11][12][13] These obstacles to cancer screenings for LEP patients can be reduced with language assistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) male gender; (2) self-reported athleticism; (3) being Hispanic, Asian, and/or white; and (4) having a main language at home other than English, which, to our minds, may indicate residual influence from cultures perhaps less averse to extreme and bloody violence in life, and in sports (Flores, Abreu, & Tomany-Korman, 2005;Stewart & Simons, 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%