2013
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited evidence for interceptive extraction of deciduous teeth to prevent permanent canine impaction

Abstract: Abstracted fromParkin N, Furness S, Shah A, et al.Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Extraction of primary canines has advantages such as technique simplicity and cost-effectiveness, 7,14 but it is still counted as a controversial approach with different reported success rates. [15][16][17] The very initial reported success rate for this method is 78% and belongs to Ericson and Kurol based on a prospective study over a 12-month period. 18 However, their rate was declined to 64% when the canine was medially displaced beyond the midline of the adjacent lateral incisor.…”
Section: Preventive and Interceptive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Extraction of primary canines has advantages such as technique simplicity and cost-effectiveness, 7,14 but it is still counted as a controversial approach with different reported success rates. [15][16][17] The very initial reported success rate for this method is 78% and belongs to Ericson and Kurol based on a prospective study over a 12-month period. 18 However, their rate was declined to 64% when the canine was medially displaced beyond the midline of the adjacent lateral incisor.…”
Section: Preventive and Interceptive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%