2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited heat tolerance in an Arctic passerine: Thermoregulatory implications for cold‐specialized birds in a rapidly warming world

Abstract: Arctic animals inhabit some of the coldest environments on the planet and have evolved physiological mechanisms for minimizing heat loss under extreme cold. However, the Arctic is warming faster than the global average and how well Arctic animals tolerate even moderately high air temperatures (Ta) is unknown. Using flow‐through respirometry, we investigated the heat tolerance and evaporative cooling capacity of snow buntings (Plectrophenax nivalis; ≈31 g, N = 42), a cold specialist, Arctic songbird. We exposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Murres increased their RMR at an upper critical temperature ( T uc ) of 29.9°C (95% CI=18.8–34.1°C), which is similar to the T uc of other cold-region birds, including snow buntings (29.8°C, 95% CI=27.9–42.2°C; O'Connor et al, 2021 ), little penguins ( Eudyptula minor , 30.0°C; Stahel and Nicol, 1982 ), Peruvian penguins ( Spheniscus humboldti , 30.0°C; Drent and Stonehouse, 1971 ) and Cassin's auklet ( Ptychoramphus aleuticus , ∼25.0°C; Richman and Lovvorn, 2011 ) and lower than those of arid and semi-arid birds (33.9–46.5°C; McKechnie et al, 2017 ; Smith et al, 2015 ; Smith et al, 2017 ). RMR increased by 1.57-fold from a mean T a =18.8°C to 36.4°C in murres, which is higher than the mean fractional increase in snow buntings (1.4; O'Connor et al, 2021 ) and some desert birds (1.26–2.66; McKechnie et al, 2016 , 2017 , Smith et al, 2017 , McWhorter et al, 2018 , Talbot et al, 2018 , Czenze et al, 2020 ). When we compared mass-specific RMRs in murres above their T uc , the slope was approximately twice as steep as that predicted from their mean M b (0.298 versus 0.146 mW g °C −1 ; Weathers, 1981 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Murres increased their RMR at an upper critical temperature ( T uc ) of 29.9°C (95% CI=18.8–34.1°C), which is similar to the T uc of other cold-region birds, including snow buntings (29.8°C, 95% CI=27.9–42.2°C; O'Connor et al, 2021 ), little penguins ( Eudyptula minor , 30.0°C; Stahel and Nicol, 1982 ), Peruvian penguins ( Spheniscus humboldti , 30.0°C; Drent and Stonehouse, 1971 ) and Cassin's auklet ( Ptychoramphus aleuticus , ∼25.0°C; Richman and Lovvorn, 2011 ) and lower than those of arid and semi-arid birds (33.9–46.5°C; McKechnie et al, 2017 ; Smith et al, 2015 ; Smith et al, 2017 ). RMR increased by 1.57-fold from a mean T a =18.8°C to 36.4°C in murres, which is higher than the mean fractional increase in snow buntings (1.4; O'Connor et al, 2021 ) and some desert birds (1.26–2.66; McKechnie et al, 2016 , 2017 , Smith et al, 2017 , McWhorter et al, 2018 , Talbot et al, 2018 , Czenze et al, 2020 ). When we compared mass-specific RMRs in murres above their T uc , the slope was approximately twice as steep as that predicted from their mean M b (0.298 versus 0.146 mW g °C −1 ; Weathers, 1981 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Murres displayed hyperthermia and increased their T b at T a =33.7°C (95% CI=22.2–37.0°C). The inflection point at T a =33.7°C is similar to that in snow buntings ( Plectrophenax nivalis , 32.6°C, 95% CI=31.0–34.4°C; O'Connor et al, 2021 ), the only other Arctic bird for which heat tolerance measurements are available, and is also within the T a range of desert and non-desert avian species ( Tieleman and Williams, 1999 ). Murres' maximum T b (43.3°C) was similar to the mean T b of birds from non-desert (43.3°C, range 41.1–45.8°C) and desert (43.6°C, range 41.5–45.4°C) environments at T a =45.0°C ( Tieleman and Williams, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations