Limited Progress in Improving Gender and Geographic Representation in Coral Reef Science

Abstract

Despite increasing recognition of the need for more diverse and equitable representation in the sciences, it is unclear whether measurable progress has been made. Here, we examine trends in authorship in coral reef science from 1,677 articles published over the past 16 years (2003–2018) and find that while representation of authors that are women (from 18 to 33%) and from non-OECD nations (from 4 to 13%) have increased over time, progress is slow in achieving more equitable representation. For example, at the current rate, it would take over two decades for female representation to reach 50%. Given that there are more coral reef non-OECD countries, at the current rate, truly equitable representation of non-OECD countries would take even longer. OECD nations also continue to dominate authorship contributions in coral reef science (89%), in research conducted in both OECD (63%) and non-OECD nations (68%). We identify systemic issues that remain prevalent in coral reef science (i.e., parachute science, gender bias) that likely contribute to observed trends. We provide recommendations to address systemic biases in research to foster a more inclusive global science community. Adoption of these recommendations will lead to more creative, innovative, and impactful scientific approaches urgently needed for coral reefs and contribute to environmental justice efforts.

Elasmobranchs’ metabarcoding requires a pragmatic approach to reach its promises

“…Without diversifying the elasmobranchs’ metabarcoding narrative, scientists from developing and least developed countries are imperiled to be passive spectators rather than active contributors to this revolutionary method (Ahmadia et al, 2021). Statements such as, “Additional samples could be taken from varying depths without adding significant field costs” (Marwayana et al, 2021); and “given the ease and cost-effective nature of eDNA sampling, such sampling efforts are not cost prohibitive” (Monuki et al, 2021); are susceptible to offering and unrealistic expectation to those researchers whose science-investment choices are limited.…”

Building Consensus around the Assessment and Interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae Diversity

“…Despite an increased recognition of the benefits and need for more diverse representation in science, systemic biases continue to persist in science at large, limiting our creativity and innovation potential (Ahmadia et al, 2021). In coral reef science, where actual reefs are mostly found in non-industrial nations, capacity-building through "leveling the playing field" is required to facilitate a more inclusive research community and advance novel and important discoveries (O'Brien et al, 2020).…”

Building leaders for the UN Ocean Science Decade: a guide to supporting early career women researchers within academic marine research institutions

“…women ECRs may struggle to get jobs, secure tenure, win research funding, and receive scientific recognition). Women ECRs lack power, therefore, they often have to find other paths, which can effectively remove competition from the academic environment (Ahmadia et al, 2021;Täuber and Mahmoudi, 2022).…”

“…Undeniably, many of these challenges have been magnified during the COVID-19 pandemic (Minello, 2020;Dattani, 2021;Fulweiler et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2021;OECD, 2021). These challenges are often even more substantial for minoritized groups facing intersecting systems of oppression (Maddrell et al, 2019), such as ethnicity (Jeffrey, 2021;Maas et al, 2021), nationality (Ahmadia et al, 2021), sexual identity (Cech and Waidzunas, 2021), disability, and economic class (O'Connell and McKinnon, 2021). Minoritized is a social constructionist approach to understanding that people are actively diminished by others rather than naturally existing as a minority, as the terms "racial minority" and "ethnic minority" imply (Gunaratnam, 2003).…”