1998
DOI: 10.1021/ac9808371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited-Sample NMR Using Solenoidal Microcoils, Perfluorocarbon Plugs, and Capillary Spinning

Abstract: This study demonstrates three improvements to mass-limited NMR using solenoidal microcoils as detectors: (1) sample confinement using liquid perfluorocarbon plugs to increase the observe factor, (2) design and incorporation of a capillary spinner to improve spectral line widths, and (3) facile sample changing via the use of a capillary insert. The probe is constructed to spin a fused silica capillary of 530 microns i.d., 700 microns o.d. inside a solenoidal coil wound around a 0.8 mm i.d., 1 mm o.d. glass capi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described in (1) and in other publications (2)(3)(4)(5), the main challenge of using microcoils is the low spectral resolution. Commonly, the linewidth LW is compromised by a nonhomogeneous distribution of the static magnetic field (B 0 -field) within the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described in (1) and in other publications (2)(3)(4)(5), the main challenge of using microcoils is the low spectral resolution. Commonly, the linewidth LW is compromised by a nonhomogeneous distribution of the static magnetic field (B 0 -field) within the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Commonly, the linewidth LW is compromised by a nonhomogeneous distribution of the static magnetic field (B 0 -field) within the sample. These field variations originate from the different magnetic susceptibilities of the materials from which the detector is constructed (6) or of the interface between the sample plug and the confinement applied (3,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present implementation this is accomplished with another liquid, forming two plugs between which the probe droplet is suspended (15). Similarly to the sample container, the plug liquid must not give any NMR signal at the observation frequency.…”
Section: Sample Confinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such commercially-available liquids have a number of distinct advantages including thermal properties that are similar to those of water, the possibility of controlling their density to make them slightly "heavier or lighter" than water (so as to better target the mixture to the observation of hydrophilic or hydrophobic substrates), and biological inertness. From the spectroscopic standpoint they also exhibit important added values in their absence of major NMR-active nuclides other than 19 F, and of suitable susceptibility matching vis-à-vis aqueous solutions (16,17). Another interesting option to consider involves combining the present approach with suitable radical quenchers, in the hope of bypassing the shortening of the hyperpolarization's T 1 should this problem be exacerbated by the use of a solvent mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%