2020
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0368-20.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Sensitivity of Hippocampal Synaptic Function or Network Oscillations to Unmodulated Kilohertz Electric Fields

Abstract: Understanding the cellular mechanisms of kilohertz (kHz) electrical stimulation is of broad interest in neuromodulation including forms of transcranial electrical stimulation, interferential stimulation, and high-rate spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Yet, the well-established low-pass filtering by neuronal membranes suggests minimal neuronal polarization in respond to charge-balanced kHz stimulation. The hippocampal brain slice model is among the most studied systems in neuroscience and exhaustively characterize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results duplicate the functional separation between brain oscillations at 20 and 70 Hz. The functional separation between 70 Hz (2,000 and 2,070 Hz) and 20 Hz (2,000 and 2,020 Hz) TI stimulation also supports the hypothesis that electric fields of high-frequency carriers (2,000 Hz) may have little contribution to the results because of the intrinsic feature of the neural membrane that filters electrical signals in a low-pass manner ( Hutcheon and Yarom, 2000 ; Esmaeilpour et al, 2020 ). Additional studies could explore the effects of carrier frequency and envelope frequency more deeply.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Our results duplicate the functional separation between brain oscillations at 20 and 70 Hz. The functional separation between 70 Hz (2,000 and 2,070 Hz) and 20 Hz (2,000 and 2,020 Hz) TI stimulation also supports the hypothesis that electric fields of high-frequency carriers (2,000 Hz) may have little contribution to the results because of the intrinsic feature of the neural membrane that filters electrical signals in a low-pass manner ( Hutcheon and Yarom, 2000 ; Esmaeilpour et al, 2020 ). Additional studies could explore the effects of carrier frequency and envelope frequency more deeply.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It seems that minimization of kHz-current shunted through ACSF in experiments with submerged slices is essential for obtaining a measurable neuronal response. When stimulating wire electrodes were placed in the bath on the sides of a slice but mainly were contacting the ACSF, no significant field effect was observed in the experiments of [24] and in our pilot experiments (not shown). Passing stimulating kHz-currents between parallel bare wires 5 mm long and 5 mm apart located above the slice also did not elicit any response at 3 mA (Fig.2), although in the setup used in the current study the kHz-FS of this amplitude was superthreshold at all frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Second, in the reported current-clamp whole-cell recordings during kHz-field application in a slice the intracellular voltage was masked by a strong high-frequency noise and an artifactual hyperpolarizing shift was observed due to the absence of the voltage follower in the headstage [23]. Third, measurements of population postsynaptic activity in the hippocampal slice before and after short (1s) or long (up to 30 min) kHz-frequency electric field application did not reveal significant effects either immediately or 30 and 60 min after termination of stimulation [24]. This is in contrast with the long lasting effects of kHz stimulation to produce peripheral axonal conduction block [25-27], or to produce central nervous system changes after spinal cord stimulation [28] and deep brain stimulation in in vivo experiments [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, tACS at 20 Hz has been reported to improve the performance of implicit learning of SRTT in previous studies [22,52]. These findings [70,71]. Additional studies could explore the effects of carrier frequency and envelope frequency more deeply.…”
Section: High Gamma and Beta Oscillations May Represent Different Motor Functions In M1mentioning
confidence: 79%