2019
DOI: 10.1101/670356
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited thermal plasticity and geographic divergence in the ovipositor of Drosophila suzukii

Abstract: Running title:Plasticity of Drosophila suzukii ovipositor to developmental temperature ). It is well-known that fruits texture is strongly affected by temperature (e. g. Bourne, 1982): specifically, their firmness and resistance to puncture tends to decrease with increasing temperature (e. g. Khazaei and Mann, 2004). It is thus conceivable that D. suzukii ovipositor might present some adaptive plasticity to temperature, allowing it to pierce fruits skins of (thermally induced) varyingresistance. An alternative… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with some of the previous studies on the invasion of D. suzukii . No difference in thermal plasticity of wing shape, activity rhythms, gene expression and ovipositor shape was detected (Fraimout et al, ; Plantamp et al, ; Varón‐González, Fraimout, Delapré, Debat, & Cornette, ). There is still scarce evidence that thermal plasticity might have contributed to the success of the invasion in this species (but see e.g., Everman et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with some of the previous studies on the invasion of D. suzukii . No difference in thermal plasticity of wing shape, activity rhythms, gene expression and ovipositor shape was detected (Fraimout et al, ; Plantamp et al, ; Varón‐González, Fraimout, Delapré, Debat, & Cornette, ). There is still scarce evidence that thermal plasticity might have contributed to the success of the invasion in this species (but see e.g., Everman et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%