2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limiter-free discontinuity-capturing scheme for compressible gas dynamics with reactive fronts

Abstract: This work proposes a new spatial reconstruction scheme in finite volume frameworks. Different from long-lasting reconstruction processes which employ high order polynomials enforced with some carefully designed limiting projections to seek stable solutions around discontinuities, the current discretized scheme employs THINC (Tangent of Hyperbola for INterface Capturing) functions with adaptive sharpness to solve both smooth and discontinuous solutions. Due to the essentially monotone and bounded properties of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the value given by hyperbolic tangent function tanh(x) lays in the region of [−1, 1], the value of THINC [24], the effect of the sharpness parameter β on numerical dissipation of the THINC scheme has been investigated with approximate dispersion relation (ADR) analysis. It is concluded that (i) with β = 1.1, denoted by β s hereafter, THINC has much smaller numerical dissipation than TVD scheme with Minmod limiter [28], and has similar but slightly better performance than the Van Leer limiter [3]; (ii) with a larger β, denoted by β l , compressive or anti-diffusion effect will be introduced, which is preferred for discontinuous solutions.…”
Section: Candidate Interpolant 2: Non-polynomial Thinc Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the value given by hyperbolic tangent function tanh(x) lays in the region of [−1, 1], the value of THINC [24], the effect of the sharpness parameter β on numerical dissipation of the THINC scheme has been investigated with approximate dispersion relation (ADR) analysis. It is concluded that (i) with β = 1.1, denoted by β s hereafter, THINC has much smaller numerical dissipation than TVD scheme with Minmod limiter [28], and has similar but slightly better performance than the Van Leer limiter [3]; (ii) with a larger β, denoted by β l , compressive or anti-diffusion effect will be introduced, which is preferred for discontinuous solutions.…”
Section: Candidate Interpolant 2: Non-polynomial Thinc Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [28], in this work we use THINC functions with β of m-level to represent different steepness, to realize non-oscillatory and less-dissipative reconstructions adaptively for various flow structures. A THINC reconstruction functionq T k i (x) with β k gives the reconstructed values q L,T k i+1/2 and q R,T k i−1/2 , (k = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Candidate Interpolant T M : Non-polynomial Thinc Function Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we propose and test fifth order scheme with P 4 T 2 − BVD, seventh order scheme with P 6 T 3 − BVD, ninth order scheme with P 8 T 3 − BVD and eleventh order scheme with P 10 T 3 − BVD. According to previous study in [28], in all tests of the present study we use β 1 = 1.1 and β 2 = 1.8 for P 4 is devised to reduce numerical dissipation to capture sharp discontinuities. In the final stage, the parameter β can be chosen from 1.6 to 2.2.…”
Section: The Bvd Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations