2008
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v13-490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limiting behavior for the distance of a random walk

Abstract: This investigation is motivated by a result we proved recently for the random transposition random walk: the distance from the starting point of the walk has a phase transition from a linear regime to a sublinear regime at time n/2. Here, we study three new examples. It is trivial that the distance for random walk on the hypercube is smooth and is given by one simple formula. In the case of random adjacent transpositions, we find that there is no phase transition even though the distance has different scalings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-known (see [8,13,18,28]) thatD, the average distance between two vertices in C 1 , is log λ n + O p (1), analogous to the fact thatD = log d−1 n + O p (1) in G(n, d), the uniform d-regular graph on n vertices 1 (both are locally-tree-like: G(n, d) resembles a d-regular tree while G(n, p) resembles a Poisson(λ)-GW tree). It is then natural to expect that t (v 1 ) mix coincides with the time it takes the walk to reach this typical distance from its origin v 1 , which would be ν −1D for a random walk on a Poisson(λ)-GW tree Supporting evidence for this on the random 3-regular graph G(n, 3) was given in [6], where it was shown that the distance of the walk from v 1 after t = c log n steps is w.h.p. (1 + o(1))(νt ∧D), with ν = 1 3 being the speed of random walk on a binary tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is well-known (see [8,13,18,28]) thatD, the average distance between two vertices in C 1 , is log λ n + O p (1), analogous to the fact thatD = log d−1 n + O p (1) in G(n, d), the uniform d-regular graph on n vertices 1 (both are locally-tree-like: G(n, d) resembles a d-regular tree while G(n, p) resembles a Poisson(λ)-GW tree). It is then natural to expect that t (v 1 ) mix coincides with the time it takes the walk to reach this typical distance from its origin v 1 , which would be ν −1D for a random walk on a Poisson(λ)-GW tree Supporting evidence for this on the random 3-regular graph G(n, 3) was given in [6], where it was shown that the distance of the walk from v 1 after t = c log n steps is w.h.p. (1 + o(1))(νt ∧D), with ν = 1 3 being the speed of random walk on a binary tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A special case of this was conjectured by Durrett, following his work with Berestycki [8] studying the SRW on a random 3-regular graph G ∼ G(n, 3). They showed that at time c log 2 n the distance of the walk from its starting point is asymptotically ( c 3 ∧ 1) log 2 n. This implies a lower bound of 3 log 2 n for the asymptotic mixing time of random 3-regular graphs, and in particular, an asymptotic lower bound of 6 log 2 n for the lazy random walk (the lazy version of a chain with transition kernel P is the chain whose transition kernel is 1 2 (P + I), i.e., in each step it stays in place with probability 1 2 , and otherwise it follows the rule of the original chain).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In order to explain this, we show that the equilibrium state can be viewed as the stationary measure of an effective split-merge process. This strategy was recently applied successfully by Schramm to the random interchange model on the complete graph [22] (the result was first conjectured by Aldous, see [6]). The absence of spatial structure makes the situation much simpler, but it was nonetheless a tour de force to prove that long cycles occur, that they satisfy an effective split-merge process, and that their asymptotic distribution is Poisson-Dirichlet (see also [5] for subsequent simplifications and improvements).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%