2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1384-1076(01)00050-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits due to instrumental polarisation in CMB experiments at microwave wavelengths

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result extends Eq. (18) in Carretti et al (2001) to Q. Further properties of the axisymmetric case lead to a better understanding of the nature of this contamination and the instrumental polarization beam Π = Π Q + jΠ U .…”
Section: Axisymmetric Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result extends Eq. (18) in Carretti et al (2001) to Q. Further properties of the axisymmetric case lead to a better understanding of the nature of this contamination and the instrumental polarization beam Π = Π Q + jΠ U .…”
Section: Axisymmetric Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A.6) in Carretti et al (2001), where only the effect on U with the antenna pointing towards the North Pole was computed.…”
Section: Instrumental Polarization Of the Antenna Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are no reflections from optical surfaces to induce spurious instrumental polarization, an unavoidable problem for any system with imaging optics 26,27,28,29 . In MBI there are no aberrations from off-axis pixels: all feed elements are equivalent and all the optics are at cryogenic temperatures to minimize losses.…”
Section: Control Of Systematic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when using correlation techniques, the knee frequency is reduced by a factor (T offset /T sys ) 2 , with T offset and T sys the instrumental offset and the system noise temperature, respectively (Wollack & Pospiesalski 1998;Carretti et al 2001). The present state of the instrument already guarantees a value f k < 2.5 × 10 −5 Hz , close to the goal knee frequency of one tenth of the ISS orbit frequency, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%