2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4916586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of carrier mobility in Sb-doped SnO2conducting films deposited by reactive sputtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise positions and heights of the two mobility maxima are unknown due to a lack of data points. Compared to ITO and AZO (see Table ), achievable electron concentrations in sputter‐deposited tin oxide are comparable, while the carrier mobility at the necessary dopant concentration appears to be limited to values below 30 cm2Vs1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precise positions and heights of the two mobility maxima are unknown due to a lack of data points. Compared to ITO and AZO (see Table ), achievable electron concentrations in sputter‐deposited tin oxide are comparable, while the carrier mobility at the necessary dopant concentration appears to be limited to values below 30 cm2Vs1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of studies available on TTO films is very limited (), much smaller than for ATO. Sputter‐deposited ATO films have generally been found to have comparatively small electron mobilities .…”
Section: State Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is interesting to note that for heavily doped semiconductors the carrier mobility can be independently obtained from optical (plasmon resonance) and electrical (Hall-effect) measurements. The optically calculated mobility reveals the in-grain scattering because the photon excitation deflects free electrons across the film over a small area, whereas the mobility obtained from Hall-effect measurements accounts also for grain boundary scattering since electrons are transported longitudinally in the layer going over a large number of grains [22][23][24]. Thus, the influence of grain boundary scattering can be deduced from the comparison of the optical and electrical data [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the market demands of SnO2 thin films, a large variety of metals or ions can be doped into SnO2 thin films to improve both optical and electrical properties [13 -15]. Among different dopants, antimony (Sb) appears to be a suitable dopant for SnO2 since the substitution of Sn 4+ by Sb 5+ into SnO2 lattice highly improves the n-type semiconductor characteristics of SnO2 [14,16]. Furthermore, antimony doped tin oxide (ATO) thin films are transparent conductive oxide (TCO) films seeing that they combine excellent electrical properties, high transparency in visible region and chemical stability [14, 17 -19].…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, ATO thin films have been prepared by different methods including electro-deposition and dipcoating [20], sputtering techniques [13,16,21], spray ultrasonic method [14,22], chemical spray pyrolysis technique [23,24], sol-gel techniques [15,19,25,26], plasma-assisted molecular epitaxy [27]. Compared with other preparation methods, herein, ATO thin films were prepared by sol-gel spin-coating method due to its simplicity, low cost and high effectiveness.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%