2018
DOI: 10.33012/2018.15549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on GNSS Performance at High Latitudes

Abstract: Coast Guard Academy, having retired from the USCG as a Captain in 2009. His research interests include efficient digital filtering methods, improved receiver signal processing techniques for electronic navigation systems, and autonomous vehicle design.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the single flight undertaken on the 15th, there appears to be consistent negative offset compared to all other flights undertaken during the survey period, with a median offset of -0.152--0.248 m when compared to F1 on the 8th and both flights on the 9th, for which there may be several potential causes. A likely prominent cause of this error is positional postprocessing, where resolving accuracy in the Z direction is traditionally most complex, with errors in the range of decimetres common, especially at high latitudes where there are no-satellite zones in the sky and the majority of satellites are close to the horizon (Hugenholtz et al, 2016;Swaszek et al, 2018). This is particularly important as a reduction in the number of satellites positioned high above the horizon reduces the ability for a receiver to determine its position, especially in the Z direction (Karaim et al, 2018;Swaszek et al, 2018).…”
Section: Data Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the single flight undertaken on the 15th, there appears to be consistent negative offset compared to all other flights undertaken during the survey period, with a median offset of -0.152--0.248 m when compared to F1 on the 8th and both flights on the 9th, for which there may be several potential causes. A likely prominent cause of this error is positional postprocessing, where resolving accuracy in the Z direction is traditionally most complex, with errors in the range of decimetres common, especially at high latitudes where there are no-satellite zones in the sky and the majority of satellites are close to the horizon (Hugenholtz et al, 2016;Swaszek et al, 2018). This is particularly important as a reduction in the number of satellites positioned high above the horizon reduces the ability for a receiver to determine its position, especially in the Z direction (Karaim et al, 2018;Swaszek et al, 2018).…”
Section: Data Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A likely prominent cause of this error is positional postprocessing, where resolving accuracy in the Z direction is traditionally most complex, with errors in the range of decimetres common, especially at high latitudes where there are no-satellite zones in the sky and the majority of satellites are close to the horizon (Hugenholtz et al, 2016;Swaszek et al, 2018). This is particularly important as a reduction in the number of satellites positioned high above the horizon reduces the ability for a receiver to determine its position, especially in the Z direction (Karaim et al, 2018;Swaszek et al, 2018). Figure 4 shows the difference in satellite locations and elevations relative to the study site for the 9th and 15th July.…”
Section: Data Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this study was to extend previous analyses by assessing the demodulation performance of the Galileo E6B signal. The focus of this work is on high-latitude conditions where satellite visibility may be partially reduced [10]. A professional Septentrio PolaRx5S was installed on a Hurtigruten vessel operating in the Norwegian Sea and reaching latitudes exceeding 71 degrees North.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A professional Septentrio PolaRx5S was installed on a Hurtigruten vessel operating in the Norwegian Sea and reaching latitudes exceeding 71 degrees North. At these latitudes, the Position Dilution Of Precision (PDOP) can be reduced, as discussed in [10,11]. Moreover, adverse ionospheric conditions [12][13][14] can further degrade receiver performance, reducing demodulation capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%