2014
DOI: 10.1080/13501674.2014.904585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits to “Jewish power”: how Slovak Jewish leaders negotiated restitution of property after the Second World War

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…78 Indeed, it is here that we see the unwillingness to face the past in its complexity, not only in the sense of allying the country with Nazi Germany but in the very communal exclusion of Jews and, hence, also in the Holocaust. 79 While it was already the resistance authorities who deemed all property transfers, according to the racial legislation of the wartime state, null and void, and while the central government in Prague attempted to regulate the restitution claims as early as on 19 May 1945, and although the restitution law was introduced on 16 May 1946, the Slovak postwar bodies were reluctant to authorize these laws, making them virtually ineffective on Slovak territory. Repeatedly, every couple of months, institutions representing Jewish victims approached the Slovak but also the central Prague administration, sometimes including President Edvard Beneš, being vocal about the guilt and responsibility on the part of both the former regime and the majority society.…”
Section: The Heroic and Traumatic Past Of A Communal Genocidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 Indeed, it is here that we see the unwillingness to face the past in its complexity, not only in the sense of allying the country with Nazi Germany but in the very communal exclusion of Jews and, hence, also in the Holocaust. 79 While it was already the resistance authorities who deemed all property transfers, according to the racial legislation of the wartime state, null and void, and while the central government in Prague attempted to regulate the restitution claims as early as on 19 May 1945, and although the restitution law was introduced on 16 May 1946, the Slovak postwar bodies were reluctant to authorize these laws, making them virtually ineffective on Slovak territory. Repeatedly, every couple of months, institutions representing Jewish victims approached the Slovak but also the central Prague administration, sometimes including President Edvard Beneš, being vocal about the guilt and responsibility on the part of both the former regime and the majority society.…”
Section: The Heroic and Traumatic Past Of A Communal Genocidementioning
confidence: 99%