2019
DOI: 10.15560/15.3.497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limpkin, Aramus guarauna (L., 1766) (Gruiformes, Aramidae), extralimital breeding in Louisiana is associated with availability of the invasive Giant Apple Snail, Pomacea maculata Perry, 1810 (Caenogastropoda, Ampullariidae)

Abstract: We document the first breeding record of Limpkin, Aramus guarauna (Linnaeus, 1766) (Gruiformes, Aramidae), for Louisiana, describe an additional unpublished breeding record from Georgia, as well as a possible record from Alabama, and associate these patterns with the concurrent establishment of the invasive Giant Apple Snail, Pomacea maculata Perry, 1810 (Caenogastropoda, Ampullariidae). We predict that an invasive prey species may facilitate range expansion by native predator species, which has ramifications … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second potential emerging threat are Giant Apple Snails (Pomacea maculata), which are potential frog egg predators [22]. Pomacea maculata have been expanding their range throughout the southern parishes of Louisiana [23] and are often found in many of the same habitats that frogs occupy. Continued monitoring my help inform whether these or other unknown threats are impacting frog populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second potential emerging threat are Giant Apple Snails (Pomacea maculata), which are potential frog egg predators [22]. Pomacea maculata have been expanding their range throughout the southern parishes of Louisiana [23] and are often found in many of the same habitats that frogs occupy. Continued monitoring my help inform whether these or other unknown threats are impacting frog populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%