1964
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5410.670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lincomycin Hydrochloride: Clinical and Laboratory Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We encountered a much higher incidence of diarrhoea in patients receiving lincomycin than the 10-20% described by other workers (Harnecker et al, 1963;Geddes et al, 1964). It is known that taking a meal shortly before lincomycin can halve the peak serum levels (McCall et al, 1967).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We encountered a much higher incidence of diarrhoea in patients receiving lincomycin than the 10-20% described by other workers (Harnecker et al, 1963;Geddes et al, 1964). It is known that taking a meal shortly before lincomycin can halve the peak serum levels (McCall et al, 1967).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Previous reports have described isolated gastro-intestinal disturbances, pruritus, and mild aches in the limbs during treatment with lincomycin. Loose stools, which have occurred mostly when the drug has been taken by mouth, have occasionally necessitated cessation of therapy (Geddes et al, 1964;MacLeod et al, 1964;Holloway et al, 1963;Harnecker, Contreras, Gilabert, and Ubilla, 1963).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies of various workers suggest that very few strains of staphylococcus are naturally resistant to lincomycin and that resistance develops less readily in vivo to lincomycin than it does to erythromycin (Lewis et al, 1962;Clapper, Meade, and Stewart, 1964;Geddes et al, 1964). Out of a total of 510 cultures of staphylococci routinely tested for sensitivity to lincomycin in vitro but isolated from patients who were not receiving lincomycin, only 2 were resistant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erythromycin and lincomycin have been compared in several previous studies, with the conclusion, usually, that erythromycin is slightly more active and is thus the more useful drug, except possibly in the treatment of osteomyelitis, for which lincomycin is preferred, but on the basis of pharmacological rather than microbiological properties (Barber and Waterworth, 1964;Geddes, Sleet, and Murdoch, 1964;Mc-Millan, McRae, and McDougall, 1967;Sanders, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%