2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2005.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line-by-line calculations of thermal infrared radiation representative for global condition: CFC-12 as an example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature values for the RE of CFC‐12 [ Fisher et al ., ; Good et al ., ; Hansen et al ., ; Jain et al ., ; Myhre and Stordal , ; Myhre et al ., ; Myhre et al ., ; Orkin et al ., ; Sihra et al ., ] provide results in the range of 0.30–0.33 W m −2 ppb −1 with a mean of 0.32 W m −2 ppb −1 , while a value of 0.32 W m −2 ppb −1 was used in AR4 (based on Myhre and Stordal []). Differences are caused by differing impact of clouds, absorption cross‐section data, and the vertical profile of decay of the mixing ratio in the stratosphere [ IPCC , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature values for the RE of CFC‐12 [ Fisher et al ., ; Good et al ., ; Hansen et al ., ; Jain et al ., ; Myhre and Stordal , ; Myhre et al ., ; Myhre et al ., ; Orkin et al ., ; Sihra et al ., ] provide results in the range of 0.30–0.33 W m −2 ppb −1 with a mean of 0.32 W m −2 ppb −1 , while a value of 0.32 W m −2 ppb −1 was used in AR4 (based on Myhre and Stordal []). Differences are caused by differing impact of clouds, absorption cross‐section data, and the vertical profile of decay of the mixing ratio in the stratosphere [ IPCC , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Myhre et al . [] found that for calculations of the CFC‐12 RE, the use of two atmospheric profiles (one for tropics and one extra‐tropics) represents global simulations with a horizontal resolution of 2.5º × 2.5º within 1%. In addition, there are several possible choices of tropopause definition that impact on the calculated forcing at the 5% level [ Freckleton et al ., ].…”
Section: Background Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RF calculations use the Oslo line-by-line (OLBL) code which was described in Myhre et al [2006]. OLBL has contributed, as a benchmark model, to several radiation code intercomparisons including Forster et al [2005Forster et al [ , 2011, Myhre et al [2009], and Randles et al [2013].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OLBL has contributed, as a benchmark model, to several radiation code intercomparisons including Forster et al [2005Forster et al [ , 2011, Myhre et al [2009], and Randles et al [2013]. We use the Myhre et al [2006] two-atmosphere (tropical/ extratropical) approach, which includes cloud data from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project, to generate global forcings. OLBL code is based on the GENLN2 LBL code, which was used to generate the clear-sky forcings presented in MHSS98, but it has been enhanced in a number of important ways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method is too time-consuming. Researchers thus use a globally averaged atmospheric profile or an average for certain profiles [28][29][30]. Here, we use three model atmospheric profiles (tropical (TRO), mid-latitude summer (MLS), and mid-latitude winter (MLW)) (Anderson et al [31]) to determine the global mean radiative flux.…”
Section: Radiative Forcing Gwp and Gtp Due To Nfmentioning
confidence: 99%