2021
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line-of-sight effects in strong gravitational lensing

Abstract: While most strong-gravitational-lensing systems may be roughly modelled by a single massive object between the source and the observer, in the details all the structures near the light path contribute to the observed images. These additional contributions, known as line-of-sight effects, are non-negligible in practice. This article proposes a new theoretical framework to model the line-of-sight effects, together with very promising applications at the interface of weak and strong lensing. Our approach relies o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the best-fit value of external shear matched a model of the line of sight for three of six galaxy lenses studied by Wong et al (2011). Subsequent papers have even proposed using external shear as relatively high signal-to-noise measurements of the 'cosmic' shear along individual lines of sight (Birrer et al 2017;Desprez et al 2018;Kuhn et al 2020;Fleury et al 2021;Hogg et al 2022). However, the best-fit values of external shear did not match the lines of sight to the three other galaxies studied by Wong et al (2011) -and, in general, best-fit values are much larger than expected for both galaxy lenses (Keeton et al 1997;Witt & Mao 1997;Hilbert et al 2007;Suyu et al 2010;Barrera et al 2021) and cluster lenses (Robertson et al 2020;Limousin et al 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, the best-fit value of external shear matched a model of the line of sight for three of six galaxy lenses studied by Wong et al (2011). Subsequent papers have even proposed using external shear as relatively high signal-to-noise measurements of the 'cosmic' shear along individual lines of sight (Birrer et al 2017;Desprez et al 2018;Kuhn et al 2020;Fleury et al 2021;Hogg et al 2022). However, the best-fit values of external shear did not match the lines of sight to the three other galaxies studied by Wong et al (2011) -and, in general, best-fit values are much larger than expected for both galaxy lenses (Keeton et al 1997;Witt & Mao 1997;Hilbert et al 2007;Suyu et al 2010;Barrera et al 2021) and cluster lenses (Robertson et al 2020;Limousin et al 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A potential way to further improve the external convergence determination is to reconstruct the entire light cone of structure around the strong lens, by assigning mass to the galaxies that are observed. First theoretical frameworks have been put forth (e.g., Collett et al 2013;McCully et al 2017;Fleury et al 2021). Subtleties remain in decoupling the cosmological dependence of the external convergence to measure the D Dt and D d distances without dependence on cosmological model assumptions.…”
Section: Line-of-sight-modeling Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraining such a small effect observationally or theoretically would be challenging. This point is important because certain combinations of weak lensing shear terms can, in principle, be measured directly from imaging data [59,67]. For convergence, Eq.…”
Section: A Msd-core ("Internal Convergence")mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modifications must be taken into account in lensing analyses [56]. In the tidal approximation, the lens equation becomes [41,44,45,47,[57][58][59] (see also App. A)…”
Section: Recap: Weak Lensing and Mass Sheet Degeneracy In Strong Lens...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation