2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line-of-sight effects on observability of kink and sausage modes in coronal structures with imaging telescopes

Abstract: Abstract. Kink modes of solar coronal structures, perturbing the loop in the direction along the line-of-sight (LOS), can be observed as emission intensity disturbances propagating along the loop provided the angle between the LOS and the structure is not ninety degrees. The effect is based upon the change of the column depth of the loop (along the LOS) by the wave. The observed amplitude of the emission intensity variations can be larger than the actual amplitude of the wave by a factor of two and there is an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, we recall that slow mode waves (slow magnetoacoustic) are, however, likely to be responsible for the oscillations between 2-8 mHz concentrated in the plage regions. We note that fast kink waves, although essentially noncompressive, may potentially be seen in radiance measurements from the change they can cause on the loop length (Wang & Solanki 2004) or, indeed, just from the angle at which they are observed (Cooper et al 2003). Taking this into account, we can consider instead that the oscillations we see in the active region loop are fast magnetoacoustic waves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4, we recall that slow mode waves (slow magnetoacoustic) are, however, likely to be responsible for the oscillations between 2-8 mHz concentrated in the plage regions. We note that fast kink waves, although essentially noncompressive, may potentially be seen in radiance measurements from the change they can cause on the loop length (Wang & Solanki 2004) or, indeed, just from the angle at which they are observed (Cooper et al 2003). Taking this into account, we can consider instead that the oscillations we see in the active region loop are fast magnetoacoustic waves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, if this is satisfied the subsequent estimates of ρ 0 /ρ e and are not affected by LOS integration effects (e.g. Cooper et al 2003;Viall & Klimchuk 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…During the observation, several distinct loop bundles appear, experiencing some transverse displacements and intensity variation. The intensity variations can perhaps be attributed to the line-of-sight integration effect (Cooper et al 2003). Also the external bundles are brighter than the internal ones, probably from the same lineintegration effect since the external bundles may have a bigger column depth along the line-of-sight (panels c, d).…”
Section: The Multi-thermal Loopmentioning
confidence: 94%