2014
DOI: 10.3390/atoms2030319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line-Shape Code Comparison through Modeling and Fitting of Experimental Spectra of the C ii 723-nm Line Emitted by the Ablation Cloud of a Carbon Pellet

Abstract: International audienceVarious codes of line-shape modeling are compared to each other through the profile of the C II 723-nm line for typical plasma conditions encountered in the ablation clouds of carbon pellets, injected in magnetic fusion devices. Calculations were performed for a single electron density of 10 17 cm −3 and two plasma temperatures (T = 2 and 4 eV). Ion and electron temperatures were assumed to be equal (T e = T i = T). The magnetic field, B, was set equal to either to zero or 4 T. Comparison… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, further theoretical investigations and benchmark experiments are needed to refine our understanding of the line-broadening calculations and reliability of K-shell spectroscopy. The workshop of Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas is held every two years to scrutinize the differences in the theoretical line-shape model details and their impact on the calculated line shapes [32][33][34][35]. Such workshops are an appropriate place for further scrutiny on the theoretical details and their impact on n e diagnostics.…”
Section: Comparison Of Merl and Totalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, further theoretical investigations and benchmark experiments are needed to refine our understanding of the line-broadening calculations and reliability of K-shell spectroscopy. The workshop of Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas is held every two years to scrutinize the differences in the theoretical line-shape model details and their impact on the calculated line shapes [32][33][34][35]. Such workshops are an appropriate place for further scrutiny on the theoretical details and their impact on n e diagnostics.…”
Section: Comparison Of Merl and Totalmentioning
confidence: 99%