2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lineage Divergence and Historical Gene Flow in the Chinese Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus sinicus)

Abstract: Closely related taxa living in sympatry provide good opportunities to investigate the origin of barriers to gene flow as well as the extent of reproductive isolation. The only two recognized subspecies of the Chinese rufous horseshoe bat Rhinolophus sinicus are characterized by unusual relative distributions in which R. s. septentrionalis is restricted to a small area within the much wider range of its sister taxon R. s. sinicus. To determine the history of lineage divergence and gene flow between these taxa, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
33
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
10
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6). Evidence for a number of these postulated glacial refugia has been reported in previous studies for many organisms, including bats (Flanders et al 2011;Khan et al 2010;Lin et al 2014;Mao et al 2013). Accordingly, we propose that the contraction of woody bamboo forests into different glacial refugia had fragmented the distribution of the Pliocene ancestors of both T. pachypus s. lat.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Tylonyteris Spp In Southeast Asia During Tsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…6). Evidence for a number of these postulated glacial refugia has been reported in previous studies for many organisms, including bats (Flanders et al 2011;Khan et al 2010;Lin et al 2014;Mao et al 2013). Accordingly, we propose that the contraction of woody bamboo forests into different glacial refugia had fragmented the distribution of the Pliocene ancestors of both T. pachypus s. lat.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Tylonyteris Spp In Southeast Asia During Tsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This structural variation suggests that the Central sinicus is more closely related to septentrionalis than to the other two sinicus taxa, a finding that is consistent with previous results based on two mtDNA protein coding genes [34]. The shared absence of repeated motifs in Central sinicus and septentrionalis could arise from introgression of the complete mitochondrial genome from septentrionalis to Central sinicus , as suggested previously [33], [34]. Alternatively, this simple structure could suggest that the Central sinicus and septentrionalis represent the ancestral form before R. sinicus diverged into several taxa, although why this has been retained whereas more complex repeated sequences have evolved in East sinicus and Hainan sinicus , is not known.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Because Rhinolophus spp. are recognized as forest‐interior specialists (Kingston, Francis, Akbar, & Kunz, ), contraction and expansion of forests during Plio‐Pleistocene have been regarded as major factors driving their biogeographical history (Flanders, Wei, Rossiter, & Zhang, ; Mao, He et al., ; Mao, Zhu, Zhang, & Rossiter, ; Rossiter, Benda, Dietz, Zhang, & Jones, ; Tu et al., ). For the R. macrotis group, we suggest that the vicariance of the most common ancestors of recent taxa might have taken place due to the persistence of different allopatric refugia across the region during Pleistocene glacial periods (Bird, Taylor, & Hunt, ; Gathorne‐Hardy, Syaukani Davies, Eggleton, & Jones, ; Lin et al., ; Morgan, Somboon, & Walto, ; Tu et al., , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, vicariant populations adaptively evolved under different ecological selections imposed by isolated refugia which may have led to shifts in their morphology (noseleaf structure and body, skull, glans penis, and baculum morphology) and echolocation systems, and subsequently their own SMRSs. Depending on the status of SMRSs of each taxon, the restoration of connectivity between some of those during interglacial periods allowed ancient introgression events between some taxa that retained their relatedness (Mao, Zhang et al., ; Mao, He et al., ; Mao, Thong et al., ). However, to test this hypothesis, further investigations including genetic analyses of both mitochondrial and nuclear genomes are needed (Berthier et al., ; Hassanin et al., ; Mao, Zhang et al., ; Nesi et al., ; Tu et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%