2018
DOI: 10.1101/488981
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lineage EM Algorithm for Inferring Latent States from Cellular Lineage Trees

Abstract: Phenotypic variability in a population of cells can work as the bet-hedging of the cells under an unpredictably changing environment, the typical example of which is the bacterial persistence. To understand the strategy to control such phenomena, it is indispensable to identify the phenotype of each cell and its inheritance. Although recent advancements in microfluidic technology offer us useful lineage data, they are insufficient to directly identify the phenotypes of the cells. An alternative approach is to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, it would be interesting to further investigate models with mother-daughter correlations or with correlated single cell growth rates. It would be also valuable to extend the calculations of fitness landscapes to include other important phenotypic state variables besides size or age, as done in [28]. We hope that our work has contributed to clarifying the connection between single lineage and population statistics and to understanding the fundamental constraints which cell growth and division must obey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the future, it would be interesting to further investigate models with mother-daughter correlations or with correlated single cell growth rates. It would be also valuable to extend the calculations of fitness landscapes to include other important phenotypic state variables besides size or age, as done in [28]. We hope that our work has contributed to clarifying the connection between single lineage and population statistics and to understanding the fundamental constraints which cell growth and division must obey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We found a nearly one hour difference between the average doubling time of wild type (14.7 hours) and Δ kaiBC (13.6 hours) strains in the experimental data [13]. More detailed validation of these predictions requires cell lineage data for many generations by cell-tracking algorithms [3033]. Such lineage analyses will also reveal the relationship between the doubling time of single cyanobacteria and that of whole populations, as has been done for E. coli [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While models of cell-size control typically predict negative correlations [1,16], the correlation of division intervals can be positive in a subset of bacterial experiments and most observations of mammalian cells [29]. The positive correlation suggests that the division interval is a heritable quantity over generations, whose dynamics was recently inferred as a latent state dynamics from cellular lineage trees [30]. The NN method we employed may contribute to disentangling the relation between cell size and division interval.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%