1980
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-10001-6_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear algebra in net theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
3

Year Published

1980
1980
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the reproducibility of a firing sequence in a Petri net indicates the existence of a T-invariant (Memmi & Roucairol, 1980 (Alaiwan, 1985;Krukeberg & Jaxy, 1987;Silva & Colom, 1991;Takano et al, 2001). Algorithms for the calculation of T-invariants are implemented in many Petri net software tools such as INA (Roch & Starke, 2001); GreatSPN (Chiola et al, 1995), TimeNET (German et al, 1995), and QPN (Bause & Kemper, 1994), to mention only a few.…”
Section: Petri Net: Theory and Applications 438mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that the reproducibility of a firing sequence in a Petri net indicates the existence of a T-invariant (Memmi & Roucairol, 1980 (Alaiwan, 1985;Krukeberg & Jaxy, 1987;Silva & Colom, 1991;Takano et al, 2001). Algorithms for the calculation of T-invariants are implemented in many Petri net software tools such as INA (Roch & Starke, 2001); GreatSPN (Chiola et al, 1995), TimeNET (German et al, 1995), and QPN (Bause & Kemper, 1994), to mention only a few.…”
Section: Petri Net: Theory and Applications 438mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is applicable for reachability analysis of a particular class of place/transition Petri nets having no transition invariants, or T-invariants. Algebraically, T-invariants of a Petri net with incidence matrix D are nonnegative integer (1 × m) vectors F such that FD = 0 (Memmi & Roucairol, 1980). According to the scheme proposed in (Kostin, 2003), given a Petri net with an initial and a target markings, a so called complemented Petri net is created that consists of the given Petri net and an additional, complementary transition with some input and output places of the original Petri net, which are uniquely determined by the initial and target markings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…', also referred to as the structural boundedness problem. It has been shown in [10] that this structural boundedness problem for parallel-composition-VASS is co-$ & % -complete, unlike for standard Petri nets where it is polynomial [12,6].…”
Section: Level 2: Parallel-composition-vassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, every unbounded system is also not structurally bounded. It will be shown in Section 7 that this structural boundedness problem for parallel-composition-VASS is co-N P-complete, unlike for standard Petri nets where it is polynomial [23,12]. (The reason for this difference is that an encoding of control-states by Petri net places does not preserve structural boundedness, because it is not assured that only one of these places is marked at any time.)…”
Section: Level 2: Parallel-composition-vassmentioning
confidence: 99%