2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.12.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear and cyclic amylose derivatives having brush like side groups in solution: Amylose tris(n-octadecylcarbamate)s

Abstract: Seven linear amylose tris(n-octadecylcarbamate) (ATODC) samples ranging in the weightaverage molar mass Mw from 2.4  10 4 to 1.5  10 6 g mol −1 and their seven cyclic analogues (cATODC) of which Mw are from 3.6  10 4 to 1.9  10 5 g mol −1 were prepared to characterize their conformation in tetrahydrohuran (THF), in 2-octanone (MHK), and in tertbutyl methyl ether (MTBE). Light and small-angle X-ray scattering and viscosity measurements in dilute solution were employed to determine the particle scattering fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is consistent with the chain diameter of 3.2 nm estimated by the SAXS profile in dilute solution. 13 A similar broad peak was also found for concentrated MHK and THF solutions of ATODC and cATODC at somewhat lower q range. The actual q value at the peak slightly depends on the sample and concentration, that is, q = 1.6 -1.7 nm −1 for ATODC in MHK (0.31 < c / g mL −1 < 0.40), q = 1.6 -1.8 nm −1 for ATODC in THF (0.25 < c / g mL −1 < 0.40), q = 1.6 -1.8 nm −1 for cATODC in MHK (0.45 < c / g mL −1 < 0.70), and q = 1.7 -2.1 nm −1 for cATODC in THF (0.45 < c / g mL −1 < 0.50); note that the concentration were not very accurate because it was hard to prepare uniform solution in the capillary cell.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This value is consistent with the chain diameter of 3.2 nm estimated by the SAXS profile in dilute solution. 13 A similar broad peak was also found for concentrated MHK and THF solutions of ATODC and cATODC at somewhat lower q range. The actual q value at the peak slightly depends on the sample and concentration, that is, q = 1.6 -1.7 nm −1 for ATODC in MHK (0.31 < c / g mL −1 < 0.40), q = 1.6 -1.8 nm −1 for ATODC in THF (0.25 < c / g mL −1 < 0.40), q = 1.6 -1.8 nm −1 for cATODC in MHK (0.45 < c / g mL −1 < 0.70), and q = 1.7 -2.1 nm −1 for cATODC in THF (0.45 < c / g mL −1 < 0.50); note that the concentration were not very accurate because it was hard to prepare uniform solution in the capillary cell.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…12,23,24 The helix pitch h per residue defined by h = LM 0 /M w was used instead of L to calculate c I and c A as a function of M w . Assuming h and  −1 from dilute solution properties, 13 that is, h = 0.36 nm and  −1 = 45 nm in MHK and h = 0.40 nm and  −1 = 24 nm in THF, d and α are needed to calculate ΔA at fixed μ0, c, and T. The theoretical value can be evaluated as a solution of the following simultaneous equations with the osmotic pressure  and the chemical potential μ of the spherocylinder…”
Section: Analysis Of the Phase Diagram Of Linear Atodc-solvent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a small h value was also found for curdlan (h = 0.18 nm) in 300 mM aqueous NaOH [33] while much larger value (h = 0.38 nm) was reported from the crystal structure of the single chain curdlan [34]. According to our recent research, tightly winding helical structure with relatively short h value can be stabilized for amylose derivatives when the side groups fit inside the helical main chain [35][36][37][38]. The shrunken helical structure for SPG and sclerox is thus most likely due to this specific interaction between the main chain and the side group as well as the intrinsic helical nature of -1,3-glucan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The chemical structure of the purified samples was confirmed by 1 H-NMR in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide with a small amount of (trimethylsilyl)-1-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt (Figure S1) whereas the intensity of each peak cannot be estimated properly as in the case of our previous study for fully substituted derivatives. [27][28] The degree of substitution DS for which full substitution is defined as DS = 3 was determined from the weight ratio of carbon to nitrogen atoms which were determined by ultimate analysis. In the present study, we chose the conventional method to obtain AEC while a modern procedure without hazardous reagents 29 could be applicable to synthesize low DS samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%