2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear and non-linear stability analysis of incompressible boundary layer over a two-dimensional hump

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend was found by Worner et al (2003) and Park & Park (2013) based on their DNS and PSE calculations.…”
Section: Comparison With the Local Linear Stability Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar trend was found by Worner et al (2003) and Park & Park (2013) based on their DNS and PSE calculations.…”
Section: Comparison With the Local Linear Stability Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The quadratic scaling with respect to h * is in contrast to linear one for steps and other forms of roughness. Park & Park (2013) used nonlinear PSE to study the nonlinear development of instability waves in a boundary layer over a wavy wall.…”
Section: Transmitted T-s Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested that expression (3) could be used to estimate the effect on stability and transition for a limited range of surface dimensions, provided that surface waviness did not enhance receptivity or excite nonlinear interaction with centrifugal instabilities that may develop as a result of the surface waviness [22]. PSE methods were also employed by Park and collaborators [23,24] to investigate the effects of a hump on both the linear and nonlinear development of the TS wave instability. Both the height and length scales of the hump were again critical to the amplification rate of the disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fage [2] Experimental Flat Plate/Aerofoil Bulges/Hollows/Ridges Carmichael Group [3][4][5] Experimental Aerofoil Waviness Holmes Group [6,7] Experimental Aerofoil Steps/Gaps Wang & Gaster [8] Experimental Flat Plate Steps Lessen & Gangwani [9] Theoretical Flat Plate Waviness Nayfeh et al [13] Theoretical Flat Plate Humps Cebeci & Egan [14] Theoretical Flat Plate Humps Masad & Iyer [15] Theoretical Flat Plate Humps Wie & Malik [20] Theoretical Flat Plate Waviness Park Group [23,24] Theoretical Flat Plate Humps Brehm et al [25] Theoretical Flat Plate Ridges/Roughness Gaster [26] Experimental Flat Plate Ridges/Roughness where the parameter n defines the number of waves before the onset of transition x tr (given for the non-deformed model). Comparing their expression for the allowable measure of surface waviness with that formulated by Fage and Carmichael [2,4], Wie and Malik concluded that Fage's criteria (1) was quite restrictive and allows significantly smaller waviness than the relationship conceived by Carmichael (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various wave configurations and compressible flow conditions were considered and it was determined that the height and length of the surface wave were critical to the stability and transition calculations, providing agreement with the earlier experimental observations. PSE methods were further utilized in the analysis of humps on a two-dimensional flat plate [19,20]. The height and length scales of the hump were again critical to the amplification rates of the established disturbances, with significant increases in the N -factor observed when the hump width was reduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%