2016
DOI: 10.22159/ijpps.2016v8s2.15212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Abstract: Parkinson's disease cases have been on the rise in the recent years, which promoted several different researches into the disorder. However, there hasn't much research been done in the non-motor aspects of the disease. This study aims to improve the understanding of one of the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Specifically, this research aims to further understand cerebral autoregulation in patients with Parkinson's disease. In order to achieve this aim, 25 subjects were recruited, with 11 healthy con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data used for this study were extracted from the Leicester Cerebral Haemodynamics Database (Patel et al 2016), which comprises a large number of recordings performed in both healthy subjects and AIS patients (Llwyd et al 2018). All studies that contributed to the database had local research Ethics Committee approval (Katsogridakis et al 2011, Nogueira et al 2013, Haunton 2014, Salinet et al 2014, Llwyd et al 2017, Lam et al 2019 and all subjects provided written informed consent. These studies had high homogeneity in protocols for inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as measurement procedures (Brodie et al 2009, Saeed et al 2013, Atkins et al 2010.…”
Section: Subjects and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data used for this study were extracted from the Leicester Cerebral Haemodynamics Database (Patel et al 2016), which comprises a large number of recordings performed in both healthy subjects and AIS patients (Llwyd et al 2018). All studies that contributed to the database had local research Ethics Committee approval (Katsogridakis et al 2011, Nogueira et al 2013, Haunton 2014, Salinet et al 2014, Llwyd et al 2017, Lam et al 2019 and all subjects provided written informed consent. These studies had high homogeneity in protocols for inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as measurement procedures (Brodie et al 2009, Saeed et al 2013, Atkins et al 2010.…”
Section: Subjects and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%