2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear buckling predictions of unstiffened laminated composite cylinders and cones under various loading and boundary conditions using semi-analytical models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30] demonstrates how other types of boundary conditions can be obtained by adding elastic constraints to the edges and using different base functions for matrix g 2 Â Ã . In Eq.…”
Section: Approximation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] demonstrates how other types of boundary conditions can be obtained by adding elastic constraints to the edges and using different base functions for matrix g 2 Â Ã . In Eq.…”
Section: Approximation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general buckling problem is derived based on the neutral equilibrium criterion of the total potential energy given in Equation 13. Following the derivation in [12,9], the general form of Equation 14 can be obtained.…”
Section: Semi-analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical integration of matrices ሾ‫ܭ‬ ሿ and ሾ‫ܭ‬ ሿ is performed extending the approach described by [14] in order to consider the new base functions ሾ݃ ሿ and ሾ݃ ଵ ሿ, such that the integration conditions shown in Table 4 are required. The generated matrices are approximately 99% sparse justifying the use of a sparse matrix-based implementation, and the current implementation, available in Ref.…”
Section: Analytical Integration Of the Linear Stiffness Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 9 the numerical and experimental results of Messager et al [39] and the predictions of Li and Lin [38] are compared with the present model (݉ ଵ = 150, ݉ ଶ = ݊ ଶ = 40), showing that for this moderately thick shell (ܴ ℎ ⁄ = 16.05) the CLPT differs from the finite element results by 5.5% and 3.3%, for the two laminates, respectively. For the analysis of Table 8 and Table 9, the computational cost associated with the proposed method is about 100 times faster than the corresponding finite element models, since only the linear stiffness matrix ሾ‫ܭ‬ ሿ and the geometric stiffness matrix of the initial stress state have to be calculated, which can be performed analytically, as presented by [14]. …”
Section: Buckling Of Imperfect Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation