2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-019-00683-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear codes over signed graphs

Abstract: We give formulas, in terms of graph theoretical invariants, for the minimum distance and the generalized Hamming weights of the linear code generated by the rows of the incidence matrix of a signed graph over a finite field, and for those of its dual code. Then we determine the regularity of the ideals of circuits and cocircuits of a signed graph, and prove an algebraic formula in terms of the multiplicity for the frustration index of an unbalanced signed graph. IntroductionThe generalized Hamming weights (GHW… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight d 2 corresponds to the minimum support of the union of two different cycles (the right part of the graph), while the weight e 2 corresponds to the minimum cardinality of the support of the union of two different cycles, where one of the cycles is a cycle of minimal length (the left part of the graph, since the only cycle of minimal length is the hexagon on the left part). See also [14] for the computation of generalized Hamming weights of (signed) graphs.…”
Section: Example 3 Consider the Following Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight d 2 corresponds to the minimum support of the union of two different cycles (the right part of the graph), while the weight e 2 corresponds to the minimum cardinality of the support of the union of two different cycles, where one of the cycles is a cycle of minimal length (the left part of the graph, since the only cycle of minimal length is the hexagon on the left part). See also [14] for the computation of generalized Hamming weights of (signed) graphs.…”
Section: Example 3 Consider the Following Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%