2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2022.105658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear cutting blocking sets and minimal codes in the rank metric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is proved in [Proposition 3.2 in [2]] that C is (rank-)nondegenerate if and only if for every A ∈ GL n (q), the code C • A is (Hamming-)nondegenerate. Note that, as already observed in [28, Corollary 6.5], nondegenerate rank-metric [n, k] q m /q code may exist only if n ≤ mk.…”
Section: Linear Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is proved in [Proposition 3.2 in [2]] that C is (rank-)nondegenerate if and only if for every A ∈ GL n (q), the code C • A is (Hamming-)nondegenerate. Note that, as already observed in [28, Corollary 6.5], nondegenerate rank-metric [n, k] q m /q code may exist only if n ≤ mk.…”
Section: Linear Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear cutting blocking sets were introduced recently in [2], in connection with minimal codes in the rank-metric. In order to define these last, we need to introduce the notion of rank-support: for a word c ∈ F 1×n q m and an ordered basis Γ = {γ 1 , .…”
Section: Construction With Linear Cutting Blocking Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations