2016
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2015.2472361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Decentralized Power Sharing Schemes for Economic Operation of AC Microgrids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where T and λ denote the incremental cost vector in economical regulator and its z transform, respectively. One can rewrite (15) and (16) in the z domain:…”
Section: The Global Dynamic Model and Parameter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where T and λ denote the incremental cost vector in economical regulator and its z transform, respectively. One can rewrite (15) and (16) in the z domain:…”
Section: The Global Dynamic Model and Parameter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the fuel cost, maintenance cost, and emission penalties of DGs, a nonlinear cost-based droop scheme, where the incremental costs of DGs were embedded into, was developed to achieve a reduction in generation cost, and a linear cost-based droop scheme was proposed later to decrease the complexity of the nonlinear droop control in [14]. Further, the power limits of DGs were taken into account when developing the decentralized economic dispatch scheme in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the lower accuracy and increased complexity of the nonlinear droop control, a linear droop scheme was proposed to achieve a reduction in generation cost [38]. Later, the constraints such as online power reserve, frequency, voltage, and power limits were taken into consideration [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By embedding the generation costs into the droop control, the cost based droop schemes discussed in [18], [35]- [39] allowed autonomous identification of the appropriate DGs for generation, in terms of the generation cost. Therefore, compared to traditional droop control, the cost based droop schemes demonstrated significant effectiveness in the reduction of the total generation cost of the MG. On the other hand, the cost based droop control schemes were incapable of keeping the total generation cost to a minimum, because the power outputs of the DGs were tuned according to their respective generation costs rather than the total generation cost of the MG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the power sharing cannot guarantee the economy of microgrid in most cases. In order to reduce the total active generation costs (TAGC) of microgrids via decentralized approach, Nutkani et al [7] presented the linear droop schemes by introducing maximum or mean generation costs to the droop coefficient, where the lower-cost DG holds higher priority of output power. Actually, the generation cost of DGs is a nonlinear function of active output power, thus the TAGC of microgrids might not be optimized efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%