1967
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(67)80209-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear free energy relationships for proton dissociation and metal complexation of pyrimidine acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear free energy relationships for proton dissociation and metal complexation have been evidenced for the pyrimidine-acid systems (35) and have also been reported in the literature for various aromatic or aliphatic systems. In water, the acidity constants of orotic acid are pK 1 = 2.07 and pK 2 = 9.45 with pK 1 corresponding to COOH and pK 2 to NH deprotonations.…”
Section: Solution Studiessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linear free energy relationships for proton dissociation and metal complexation have been evidenced for the pyrimidine-acid systems (35) and have also been reported in the literature for various aromatic or aliphatic systems. In water, the acidity constants of orotic acid are pK 1 = 2.07 and pK 2 = 9.45 with pK 1 corresponding to COOH and pK 2 to NH deprotonations.…”
Section: Solution Studiessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Relationships between complexation sites of pyrimidine derivatives and UV data have been reported in the past and one may note that the UV spectra predict the sites of deprotonation and then those of coordination (35)(36)(37); this was the case with copper and nickel complexes of orotic acid (38) for which the complexation induced a significant bathochromic shift of the ligand absorption band (λ max = 316 nm versus 285 nm for the free ligand) correlated to complexation at the carboxylic group and adjacent endocyclic nitrogen atom.…”
Section: Solution Studiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, there is no study comparing those organic compounds, although both are approved supplements. Zinc aspartate is less stable than zinc orotate (log 10 K Zn aspartate = 2.9, log 10 K Zn orotate = 6.42) [75,76], and therefore might provide more absorbable zinc ions. Other chemical factors affecting a substance's bioavailability in addition to its stability: there are, for example, its solubility in water, the charge density, its reduction potential, the environmental pH and the formation of complexes.…”
Section: Influences On Zinc Bioavailability and Functions In Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to biological interest in orotic acid complexes, several investigators have focused attention on the coordinating properties of the acid. It was found that, in neutral or slightly acidic pH, Cu(II), Zn(II), Co(II), Mn(II), Fe(III), Cr(III), VO(II), Cd(II), Hg(II) and Ag(I) complexes, the acid can coordinate through the carboxylate group, while in Ni(II), Co(II) and Cu(II) complexes it coordinates through the carboxylate and the adjacent N(3) [10][11][12][13][14]. The crystal structure determination of the complexes confirmed the bidentate coordination of orotic acid through N(3) and the carboxylate group [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%