2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61342-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear growth in prepubertal asthmatic children treated with montelukast, beclomethasone, or placebo: a 56-week randomized double-blind study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
30
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the montelukast growth study, children with mild persistent asthma were randomly placed on montelukast, BDP, or placebo, and it was observed that the mean growth velocity was slower in the BDP group than either the placebo or montelukast groups (56). No effect on pulmonary function was noted in this investigation.…”
Section: Newer Versus Older Inhaled Corticosteroidsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In the montelukast growth study, children with mild persistent asthma were randomly placed on montelukast, BDP, or placebo, and it was observed that the mean growth velocity was slower in the BDP group than either the placebo or montelukast groups (56). No effect on pulmonary function was noted in this investigation.…”
Section: Newer Versus Older Inhaled Corticosteroidsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The results showed that linear growth velocity in the beclomethasone group was significantly less than in the placebo group (difference = -0.78 cm/year; p < 0.001) or the montelukast group (0.81 cm/year; p < 0.001). The growth rate was similar for both montelukast and placebo [144]. One recent study assessed the influence of montelukast on shortterm lower leg growth rate (LLGR) in 71 prepubertal children with asthma.…”
Section: Children (Aged 6-14 Years)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8 Previous studies conforming to these criteria have been conducted in patients with asthma treated with orally inhaled corticosteroids. [9][10][11] Although studies with TAA-AQ in children with AR have examined its efficacy and safety 12 as well as GV, 13,14 the long-term effect of TAA-AQ on growth has not been assessed in randomized controlled trials. This study, designed per the FDA guidance recommendations, evaluates the difference in the GV of children aged 3-9 years with PAR treated with intranasal TAA-AQ or placebo for 12 months.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%