“…61,62 This level of theory has proved to excellently reproduce the molecular geometries obtained from the SCXRD studies of [N−I−N] + and R−C(O)O−I−N (hypoiodite) halogen-bonded iodine(I) complexes. 6,[17][18][19]26,27,33,38,40,45,50,57 The DFT structures generally showed excellent agreement with the experimentally determined structures, with most values falling within a ±0.01−0.03 Å range and a maximum discrepancy of 0.086 Å for the O−I bond length of 1e, though this discrepancy might have been exacerbated by the twinned data refinement of the solid-state structure of 1e (see Supporting Information). The calculated structures for 2c and 2d (2c_DFT and 2d_DFT, respectively), for which the SCXRD structures were not observed, indicated the same divergence from their quinuclidine analogues 1c_DFT and 1d_DFT, with noticeably shorter O−I and longer I−N bond lengths for the ditopic DABCO complexes, which in both cases predicted differences of ∼0.05 Å (for 1c_DFT vs 2c_DFT and 1d_DFT vs 2d_DFT).…”