“…where N ≥ 3, t > 0, λ > 0 and 2 < q < 2 * = 2N N−2 . Based on our recent study on the normalized solutions of the above equation in [31], we prove that (1) the above equation has two positive radial solutions for N = 3, 2 < q < 4 and t > 0 sufficiently large, which gives a rigorous proof of the numerical conjecture in [14]; (2) there exists t * q > 0 for 2 < q ≤ 4 such that the above equation has ground-states for t ≥ t * q in the case of 2 < q < 4 and for t > t * 4 in the case of q = 4 while, the above equation has no ground-states for 0 < t < t * q for all 2 < q ≤ 4, which, together with the well-known results on groundstates of the above equation, almost completely solve the existence of ground-states to the above equation, except for N = 3, q = 4 and t = t * 4 . Moreover, based on the almost completed study on ground-states to the above equation, we introduce a new argument to study the normalized solutions of the above equation to prove that there exists 0 < ta,q < +∞ for 2 < q < 2+ 4 N such that the above equation has no positive normalized solutions for t > ta,q with R N |u| 2 dx = a 2 , which, together with our recent study in [31], gives a completed answer to the open question proposed by Soave in [30].…”