2004
DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments

Abstract: The problem of identifying differentially expressed genes in designed microarray experiments is considered. Lonnstedt and Speed (2002) derived an expression for the posterior odds of differential expression in a replicated two-color experiment using a simple hierarchical parametric model. The purpose of this paper is to develop the hierarchical model of Lonnstedt and Speed (2002) into a practical approach for general microarray experiments with arbitrary numbers of treatments and RNA samples. The model is rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
9,833
0
31

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10,483 publications
(9,888 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
24
9,833
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…52,53 A linear model was fitted to each gene, and empirical Bayes moderated t-statistics were used to assess differences in expression. 54 A false discovery rate cut-off of 0.15 was applied for calling differentially expressed genes. Gene Ontology and gene enrichment analyses were performed using Metascape (http://metascape.org).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52,53 A linear model was fitted to each gene, and empirical Bayes moderated t-statistics were used to assess differences in expression. 54 A false discovery rate cut-off of 0.15 was applied for calling differentially expressed genes. Gene Ontology and gene enrichment analyses were performed using Metascape (http://metascape.org).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify any significant differential expression, the microarray data were analyzed using Limma (Linear Models for Microarray Data) [68] from the Bioconductor open-source project running under R [69,70]. After data pre-processing using within-array global loess normalization, the empirical eBayes method in Limma, which computes moderated t-statistics, moderated F-statistics, and log-odds of differential expression, was applied to identify the significance of differential expression in each culture condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Limma program in the R-based Bioconductor package to calculate the level of differential expression [49]. Briefly, a linear model was fit to the data (with cell means corresponding to the different conditions and a random effect for array), and the list of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with Pvalue <0.01 were obtained by performing the following comparisons based on collected patients' characteristics: USC stage (late vs. early), EAC stage (late vs. early), USC prognosis (good vs. poor), and EAC prognosis (good vs. poor).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%