1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66286-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Prediction of Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
490
0
45

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,836 publications
(535 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
490
0
45
Order By: Relevance
“…We studied formants (F1, F2, F3, F4) using linear predictive coding (LPC; Markel and Gray 1976). LPC is based on the assumption that the vocal signal is produced by a buzz generated at the glottis.…”
Section: Sound Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied formants (F1, F2, F3, F4) using linear predictive coding (LPC; Markel and Gray 1976). LPC is based on the assumption that the vocal signal is produced by a buzz generated at the glottis.…”
Section: Sound Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extract features related to statistics of formant contours (Table 1), pitch contours (Table 2), and energy contours ( Table 3). The method to estimate formants relies on the linear prediction analysis [35], whereas pitch is computed based on an autocorrelation method. Statistics related to the distribution of energy into several spectral bands (Table 4) as well as statistics of the TEO-autocorrelation (Table 5) are also computed.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, for each phoneme all patients were treated as one group and independent factors were the two repeated measurement interviews (AI and DI) and repetition of the utterances (three times). Dependent variables were the formant frequencies which were extracted by means of linear prediction routines (Markel and Gray, 1976).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%