2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1112088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear-Quadratic Approximation to Unconditionally Optimal Policy: The Distorted Steady-State

Abstract: This paper establishes that one can generally obtain a purely quadratic approximation to the unconditional expectation of social welfare when the steady-state is distorted. A specific example is provided employing a canonical New Keynesian model. Unlike in the non-distorted steady state case, the approximate loss function is not defined simply over terms in inflation and output. Furthermore, optimal steady state inflation and the nominal interest rate are positive. JEL Classification: E20; E32; F32; F41.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Kimbrough (2006) shows that it can happen when the government maximises seignorage. Damjanovic et al. (2008) show that the optimal inflation rate becomes positive when the government discount factor differs from the private one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Kimbrough (2006) shows that it can happen when the government maximises seignorage. Damjanovic et al. (2008) show that the optimal inflation rate becomes positive when the government discount factor differs from the private one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, from a normative perspective, some recent papers (Kimbrough, 2006; Damjanovic et al. , 2008; Levine et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, even the linear‐quadratic representation of the policy problem would differ for our two policy alternatives, increasing the disparities between their policy recommendations. Benigno and Woodford (2005, 2006) study the implications for the timeless‐perspective policy, while Damjanovic, Damjanovic and Nolan (2008b) do the same for the optimal unconditional continuation policy. The fundamental difference in terms of the distinct treatment of initial‐period policy expectations remains the same.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…non-zero) in the presence of small disturbances ξ. 20 Again, sometimes it is possible to arrange for a problem to have this form, through some combination of restrictive model specification and an appropriate change of variables, as in Rotemberg and Woodford (1997). 21 But once again, the class of cases to which this result can be applied are likely to be quite restrictive.…”
Section: Special Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 Damjanovic et al (2008) show that one can instead use an LQ approximation to evaluate timeinvariant policy rules under an alternative criterion, which computes the expected value of V t0 under a probability distribution for initial conditions that is independent of the policy rule considered, as in the calculations here, but rather under the ergodic distribution for the endogenous variables associated with the particular time-invariant policy that is to be evaluated. This criterion has the unappealing feature of giving a rule that leads to different long-run average values of an endogenous variable (e.g., the capital stock) "credit" for a higher initial average value of the variable as well.…”
Section: A Lagrangian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%