2021
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2020.3015840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Recursive Non-Local Edge-Aware Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use Middlebury and KITTI datasets to validate typical cost aggregation approaches, namely BF [12], GF [11], NL [16], DT [20], LRNL [28], FCGF [18], and ST [17]. The input stereo images are normalized to [0, 1] at first, and then used to compute matching costs at all candidate disparities.…”
Section: Stereo Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Middlebury and KITTI datasets to validate typical cost aggregation approaches, namely BF [12], GF [11], NL [16], DT [20], LRNL [28], FCGF [18], and ST [17]. The input stereo images are normalized to [0, 1] at first, and then used to compute matching costs at all candidate disparities.…”
Section: Stereo Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segment-tree (ST) built by Mei et al [16] aims to enforce tight connections for pixels in a local region, while the structure of tree used for propagating message heavily depends on super-pixel segmentation [17]. The recursive non-local filter (RNLF) [18] builds four trees for input image based on the relative spatial relationships of neighboring pixels. The Chebyshev distance is used to compute the weight between any two pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%