2013
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2013.844370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear response theory and optimal control for a molecular system under non-equilibrium conditions

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a straightforward generalisation of the linear response theory on a finite time-horizon to systems in non-equilibrium that are subject to external forcing. We briefly revisit the standard linear response result for equilibrium systems, where we consider Langevin dynamics as a special case, and then give an alternative derivation using a change-of-measure argument that does not rely on any stationarity or reversibility assumption. This procedure easily enables us to calculate the secon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, from an MSM for a given periodic forcing, optimal control problems may come into play. Using available methods, such as non-equilibrium linear response theory 51 or computational alchemy for MSMs, 52 one can construct the MSM for slightly changed parameters (e.g., period and amplitude) of the external forcing by appropriate reweighting of the MSM for the given forcing. This, in principle, allows for answering questions such as the following: for which parameters of the external forcing does one achieve maximal population of the lefthanded α-helix?…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from an MSM for a given periodic forcing, optimal control problems may come into play. Using available methods, such as non-equilibrium linear response theory 51 or computational alchemy for MSMs, 52 one can construct the MSM for slightly changed parameters (e.g., period and amplitude) of the external forcing by appropriate reweighting of the MSM for the given forcing. This, in principle, allows for answering questions such as the following: for which parameters of the external forcing does one achieve maximal population of the lefthanded α-helix?…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vectorized solution to ( 34)-( 37) is given by m * as in (26), where α * again denotes the eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue of the matrix U U . Finally, as for the positive M case, we have that both m * and −m * yield the same Euclidean norm of the response (34). Hence, we choose the sign of the matrix m * so that h M 2 < h M +εm * 2 for small ε > 0.…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This important avenue of research has relatively few precendents in the literature. One exception is [34] who consider optimal control of Langevin dynamics; using a linear response approach, they apply a gradient descent algorithm to minimise a specified linear functional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "inverse problem" of determining perturbations to achieve a particular response in the invariant measure has been studied in [21,31]. Determining optimal perturbations that maximise certain quantities relating to the system has been addressed in [39,2]. In the present paper we apply the idea of linear response to quantify the response of finite-time mixing properties in dynamical systems by developing theory to describe the response of finite-time coherent sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%