2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear solvation energy relationships of anionic dimeric surfactants in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We contacted the authors and they provided us with the corrected numerical values for k CTAB and k SDS . We updated our existing micellar SDS correlation to include the corrected MEKC log k SDS data from the Fuguet et al [7], and the published MEKC retention factor data reported by van Biesen and Bottaro [27], Foley et al [28], Vitha and Carr [29], and Bailey and Dorsey [30]. The recently reported partition coefficient data of Tellez et al [31] was also included in the new regression analysis.…”
Section: Full Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We contacted the authors and they provided us with the corrected numerical values for k CTAB and k SDS . We updated our existing micellar SDS correlation to include the corrected MEKC log k SDS data from the Fuguet et al [7], and the published MEKC retention factor data reported by van Biesen and Bottaro [27], Foley et al [28], Vitha and Carr [29], and Bailey and Dorsey [30]. The recently reported partition coefficient data of Tellez et al [31] was also included in the new regression analysis.…”
Section: Full Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few earlier reports described the use of gemini surfactants as micelle‐forming reagents in MEKC, and found that the gemini surfactants exhibit better resolution or wider migration time windows than the commonly used single‐chained surfactants 10–12. Warner and coworkers 13, 14 and Bottaro and Van Biesen 15–17 systematically studied the use of anionic gemini surfactants as pseudostationary phases in MEKC, and presented some advantages of anionic gemini surfactants compared with conventionally used SDS. Due to their lower critical micelle concentrations, the gemini surfactants can be used at much lower concentrations than SDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they can work better than SDS in separating particular sets of compounds, e.g. highly hydrophobic compounds 17. Recently, Liu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they can work better than SDS in separating particular sets of compounds, e.g. highly hydrophobic compounds [17]. Recently, Liu et al reported that cationic gemini surfactants were good capillary coating materials for separation of proteins in aqueous media [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few earlier reports described the use of gemini surfactants as micelleforming reagents in MEKC, and found that the gemini surfactants exhibit better resolution or wider migration time windows than the commonly used single-chained surfactants [10][11][12]. Warner and coworkers [13][14] and Bottaro and Van Biesen [15][16][17] systematically studied the use of anionic gemini surfactants as pseudostationary phases in MEKC, and presented some advantages of anionic gemini surfactants compared with conventionally used SDS. Due to their lower critical micelle concentrations, the gemini surfactants can be used at much lower concentrations than SDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%