2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.12298
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear TDOA-based Measurements for Distributed Estimation and Localized Tracking

Abstract: We propose a linear time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA) measurement model to improve distributed estimation performance for localized target tracking. We design distributed filters over sparse (possibly large-scale) communication networks using consensus-based data-fusion techniques. The proposed distributed and localized tracking protocols considerably reduce the sensor network's required connectivity and communication rate. We, further, consider κ-redundant observability and faulttolerant design in case of los… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to these drawbacks, the linearized distributed tracking is not very accurate. What we suggested [4], [5], is a target-independent 1 and time-invariant linear measurement matrix (as in general LTI setups) which is compatible with most existing distributed filtering schemes. What is new in this paper is to take into account possible time delays in information exchange between every two sensors which makes the networked filtering scenario even more challenging.…”
Section: B Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to these drawbacks, the linearized distributed tracking is not very accurate. What we suggested [4], [5], is a target-independent 1 and time-invariant linear measurement matrix (as in general LTI setups) which is compatible with most existing distributed filtering schemes. What is new in this paper is to take into account possible time delays in information exchange between every two sensors which makes the networked filtering scenario even more challenging.…”
Section: B Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Fig. 2: A comparison on the Kalman Filtering performance between our linear measurement model ( 5)-( 7) and the (linearized) nonlinear model ( 3)-( 4) [5]. For the latter case, instead of the exact target position p (which is unknown), its estimated value p i is needed in ( 3)-( 4).…”
Section: This Is Linearized As Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation