54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronaut 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.iac-03-u.2.b.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Two-Axis MOEMS Sun Sensor and the Need for MEMS in Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing the position of the satellite in its orbit, and the local vector of the magnetic field allows determining the relative orientation of the satellite with respect to the Earth. When SwissCube is not in the shadow of the earth, the attitude determination system is completed by third set of MEMS sensors, micromachined Sun sensors developed and fabricated at the Danish Technical University (DTU) [32]. One sensor is mounted on each face of the spacecraft, as illustrated in Figure 9.…”
Section: (Swiss) Cubesatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing the position of the satellite in its orbit, and the local vector of the magnetic field allows determining the relative orientation of the satellite with respect to the Earth. When SwissCube is not in the shadow of the earth, the attitude determination system is completed by third set of MEMS sensors, micromachined Sun sensors developed and fabricated at the Danish Technical University (DTU) [32]. One sensor is mounted on each face of the spacecraft, as illustrated in Figure 9.…”
Section: (Swiss) Cubesatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two methods described above do not show much difference in average error, and only a reduction of coefficients of the fitted polynomial results from adopting the physical modeling method. Pedersen et al considered the physical modeling method in developing a MEMS sun sensor, without considering the cross-coupling and shadowing effects [8]. It is claimed, in this case, that the slit thickness is minimal such that the shadow effect can be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical error due to the imperfection in geometry of the slit and the photo-cells can also contribute to the overall modeling errors. Optical error includes cross-coupling effect where the sensor output according to the incident angle of the light coming through the slit causes both azimuth and elevation angle errors, and the shadowing effect where the sensor output is affected by the slit thickness that causes a reduction in the actual area where the sunlight illuminates the photo-cell [5,6,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So on many occasions, the total mass and power consumption will increase. For example in ADCS of AAUSAT II six coarse sun sensors are used [14] , ADCS of PIONEER spacecraft has 6 sun sensors [15] and 6 coarse sun sensors are applied in SCISAT ADCS [16] . Hence, a sun sensor with a small mass, low power and a wide FOV that can be replaced with two or more sensors will largely save mass and power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%