2002
DOI: 10.1002/polb.10219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear versus nonlinear determinations of equilibrium melting temperatures of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and miscible blend with poly(ether imide) exhibiting multiple melting peaks

Abstract: Multiple melting peaks in some semicrystalline polymers such as poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) have caused some difficulty in estimating accurately the equilibrium melting points. PTT forms a miscible blend with amorphous poly(ether imide) (PEI); for comparison purposes, a miscible system of a fixed composition (PTT/ PEI of weight ratio ϭ 9/1) was determined. PTT and its miscible blend both exhibited dual melting peaks (labeled as low and high peaks: T m,L , T m,H ), and the first peaks (T m,L ), not t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The T 0 m value for PTT based on the NLHW procedure has previously been reported to be ca. 273 • C [38], which is in excellent agreement with the obtained value. The marked difference in the T 0 m values obtained by the LHW and the NLHW procedure should be noted.…”
Section: Determination Of the Equilibrium Melting Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The T 0 m value for PTT based on the NLHW procedure has previously been reported to be ca. 273 • C [38], which is in excellent agreement with the obtained value. The marked difference in the T 0 m values obtained by the LHW and the NLHW procedure should be noted.…”
Section: Determination Of the Equilibrium Melting Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…280 [34], 285 [35], and 291 • C [27], for PTT to be ca. 237 [36], 244 [37], 245 [38], and 248 • C [2], and for PBT to be ca. 235 [35], 244 [39] and 245 • C [36], respectively.…”
Section: Determination Of the Equilibrium Melting Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Marand and co-workers 16,17 recently discussed the validity of the basic premise of the linear Hoffmann-Weeks treatment: that is, the thickening coefficient for lamellae, g, taken as independent of T c and time. [18][19][20] As demonstrated by some results in the literature, [16][17][18][19][20][21] the linear extrapolation, when carried out for lamellar crystals exhibiting a constant g value, invariably underestimates T m 1 and leads to an overestimation of the g value. In fact, the HoffmannWeeks procedure does not account for the significant contribution to the difference between the melting and crystallization temperatures that arises from the temperature dependence of the fold surface free energy and the thickness increment above the minimum (thermodynamic) lamellar thickness.…”
Section: Melting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In order to overcome these disadvantages, a correction of the effect of thermal lag and a calorimetric study using various heating rates have been carried out, according to the procedure adopted by Sohn and Wu. [19,20] As well known, the increment in the observed peak temperature is proportional to the square root of the heating rate at constant thermal resistance, heat of fusion and sample weight, on the basis of the theory of heatflow calorimetry. [21] The observed melting temperatures have been therefore plotted as a function of the square root of heating rate, r 1/2 , for the different T c s (see some typical curves in Figure 8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%