2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00397-016-0991-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear viscoelasticity of a dilute active suspension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors verified the absence of collective motion at these volume fractions based on the velocity profile in the cone-plate rheometer being a simple shear. This decrease in the viscosity, in the absence of collective motion, has been explained based on both the Stokes–Smoluchowski (Bechtel & Khair 2017; Nambiar et al. 2017) and Landau–deGennes (Hatwalne et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors verified the absence of collective motion at these volume fractions based on the velocity profile in the cone-plate rheometer being a simple shear. This decrease in the viscosity, in the absence of collective motion, has been explained based on both the Stokes–Smoluchowski (Bechtel & Khair 2017; Nambiar et al. 2017) and Landau–deGennes (Hatwalne et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The flow perturbation created by the tail-actuated swimming mechanism of the oriented bacteria (termed 'pushers') reinforces the fluid flow along the extensional axis of the imposed shear. Hence, the suspension viscosity is reduced below that of the solvent (Hatwalne et al 2004;Sokolov & Aranson 2009;Saintillan 2010;Gachelin et al 2013;López et al 2015;Bechtel & Khair 2017;Nambiar, Nott & Subramanian 2017;Saintillan 2018;Nambiar et al 2019b). This is in sharp contrast to suspensions with passive microstructural elements which always resist the imposed shear, leading to an enhanced viscosity (Batchelor 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later theory by Giomi et al revealed even richer dynamics and predicted the existence of shear banding, yield stress, and "superfluidity" of active fluids (22). Unusual rheology of active fluids has also been studied based on the microhydrodynamics of microswimmers at low concentrations (23)(24)(25)(26)(27), swimming pressures (28) and gener-alized Navier-Stokes equations (29). Experimentally, Sokolov et al and Gachelin et al showed the low viscosity of bacterial suspensions in thin films (30,31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an effect, first explained by Hatwalne et al (Hatwalne et al 2004), leads to a reduction of the resistance of pusher suspensions to shear and the decrease of suspension viscosity. Incorporating further orientational dynamics of bacteria, continuum kinetic theories have been constructed based on the above picture, which quantitatively explained the rheology of dilute bacterial suspensions (Haines et al 2009;Saintillan 2010;Ryan et al 2011;Moradi and Najafi 2015;Alonso-Matilla, Ezhilan, and Saintillan 2016;Bechtel and Khair 2017). Hydrodynamic models have also been developed along a similar line (Cates et al 2008;Giomi, Liverpool, and Marchetti 2010;Slomka and Dunkel 2017), which successfully predicted the existence of bacterial superfluids with zero apparent viscosity (Marchetti 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%