2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearity defects of face rings

Abstract: Let S = K[x 1 , . . . , x n ] be a polynomial ring over a field K, and E = y 1 , . . . , y n an exterior algebra. The linearity defect ld E (N ) of a finitely generated graded E-module N measures how far N departs from "componentwise linear". It is known that ld E (N ) < ∞ for all N . But the value can be arbitrary large, while the similar invariant ld S (M) for an S-module M is always at most n. We will show that if I Δ (resp. J Δ ) is the squarefree monomial ideal of S (resp. E) corresponding to a simplicial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But a computer experiment suggests that the bound (1) could be very far from sharp. For example, if I ⊂ E is a monomial ideal then we have ld E (E/I ) ≤ max{n − 2, 1} ( [15]). This does not hold for general graded ideals.…”
Section: · · · −→ A(−i) β I (K) −→ · · · −→ A(−2) β 2 (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But a computer experiment suggests that the bound (1) could be very far from sharp. For example, if I ⊂ E is a monomial ideal then we have ld E (E/I ) ≤ max{n − 2, 1} ( [15]). This does not hold for general graded ideals.…”
Section: · · · −→ A(−i) β I (K) −→ · · · −→ A(−2) β 2 (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linearity defect was studied by many authors, see for example [1], [6], [15], [19], [21], [22], [23]. Nevertheless, it is still an elusive invariant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, while the Hochster's formula can give much information about the regularity of Stanley-Reisner ideals (see for example Dochtermann and Engström [5]), up to now there is no combinatorial interpretation of the linearity defect of Stanley-Reisner ideals. (See [32], [35] for some results about the linearity defect of such ideals.) Second and furthermore, the linearity defect generally cannot be read off from the Betti table: for example (see [20,Example 2.8]), the ideals I 1 = (x 4 1 , x 3 1 x 2 , x 2 1 x 2 2 , x 1 x 3 2 , x 4 2 , x 3 1 x 3 , x 2 1 x 2 x 2 3 , x 2 1 x 3 3 , x 1 x 2 2 x 2 3 ) and 3 ] have the same graded Betti numbers, but the first one has linearity defect 0 while the second one has positive linearity defect (equal to 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 6 concerns with the computation of linearity defect for the simplest non-weakly-chordal graphs, namely cycles of length ≥ 5. (For complements of cycles, the computation was done in [32,Theorem 5.1].) Besides applications to the theory of regularity and projective dimension of edge ideals, in Section 7, we prove Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%